Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics

Shubhadip Ray, Tharangini Palanivel, Norbert Herman, Yixuan Li
{"title":"Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics","authors":"Shubhadip Ray, Tharangini Palanivel, Norbert Herman, Yixuan Li","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As human beings, we have the inherent bias towards our likes and dislikes. These likes and dislikes are influenced by our psychographic attributes, morals, values, beliefs and societal networks in both circles of influence and circles of concern. We continuously consume products, services as well as produce products and services for others to consume. Due to our inherent bias of likes and dislikes, we unintentionally or intentionally end up liking products and/or services that are personalized for us, or somehow unintentionally match our likes. This personalization makes our lives easier and more comfortable as it may save time, and/or enable us to achieve desired experiences. This personalization is influenced by the data gathered about us directly or indirectly. The richer the data is about us, the more personalized products and services we receive, thereby saving us time and money whilst meeting our desired goals for experience or exchange of value for the offers we are wanting. We remain forever concerned about the direct or accidental use of our data that can fall into the hands of nefarious users of the dark web, or criminals who can cause us all kinds of harm using the data we shared. Herein lies the paradox of personalization and privacy. To solve this paradox, we acknowledge that there has to be a trade-off between data privacy and personalization, and an optimized match on trust, value etc. between the data owners (data subjects) and data buyers. In this paper, we propose approaches to handle these trade-offs in an optimized way with the acceptance threshold determined by a methodology to optimize the match between trust and value perceptions specific to an individual, and in context of the trust we place on the data controller, processor or buyer entity with which we share and entrust our data for the exchange of value provided.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As human beings, we have the inherent bias towards our likes and dislikes. These likes and dislikes are influenced by our psychographic attributes, morals, values, beliefs and societal networks in both circles of influence and circles of concern. We continuously consume products, services as well as produce products and services for others to consume. Due to our inherent bias of likes and dislikes, we unintentionally or intentionally end up liking products and/or services that are personalized for us, or somehow unintentionally match our likes. This personalization makes our lives easier and more comfortable as it may save time, and/or enable us to achieve desired experiences. This personalization is influenced by the data gathered about us directly or indirectly. The richer the data is about us, the more personalized products and services we receive, thereby saving us time and money whilst meeting our desired goals for experience or exchange of value for the offers we are wanting. We remain forever concerned about the direct or accidental use of our data that can fall into the hands of nefarious users of the dark web, or criminals who can cause us all kinds of harm using the data we shared. Herein lies the paradox of personalization and privacy. To solve this paradox, we acknowledge that there has to be a trade-off between data privacy and personalization, and an optimized match on trust, value etc. between the data owners (data subjects) and data buyers. In this paper, we propose approaches to handle these trade-offs in an optimized way with the acceptance threshold determined by a methodology to optimize the match between trust and value perceptions specific to an individual, and in context of the trust we place on the data controller, processor or buyer entity with which we share and entrust our data for the exchange of value provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向数据隐私和共享经济的立方体优化
作为人类,我们对自己的好恶有固有的偏见。这些喜欢和不喜欢受到我们的心理属性、道德、价值观、信仰和社会网络在影响圈和关注圈中的影响。我们不断地消费产品和服务,也不断地生产产品和服务供他人消费。由于我们固有的喜欢和不喜欢的偏见,我们无意或有意地最终喜欢上了为我们量身定制的产品和/或服务,或者不知何故无意中匹配了我们的喜好。这种个性化使我们的生活更轻松,更舒适,因为它可以节省时间,和/或使我们能够获得期望的体验。这种个性化设置直接或间接地受到收集到的有关我们的数据的影响。关于我们的数据越丰富,我们收到的产品和服务就越个性化,从而节省我们的时间和金钱,同时满足我们想要的体验或价值交换的预期目标。我们始终担心我们的数据被直接或意外地使用,可能落入暗网的邪恶用户之手,或者犯罪分子利用我们共享的数据给我们造成各种伤害。这就是个性化和隐私的矛盾所在。为了解决这一悖论,我们承认必须在数据隐私和个性化之间进行权衡,并在数据所有者(数据主体)和数据购买者之间优化信任,价值等匹配。在本文中,我们提出了以优化方式处理这些权衡的方法,通过一种方法确定接受阈值,以优化特定于个人的信任和价值感知之间的匹配,并在我们对数据控制器,处理器或买方实体的信任的背景下,我们共享和委托我们的数据以交换所提供的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Historical and Ideological Chasm between Engineering and Development Sustainability means inclusivity: engaging citizens in early stage smart city development Taiwan’s Ability to Reduce the Transmission of COVID-19: A Success Story Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics Using Open Source Licensing to Regulate the Assembly of LAWS: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1