A Comparison of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach and Classic Laminectomy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in terms of postoperative back pain.

Osama A. Khan, M. Khan, M. Azam, Z. Abideen, S. Uddin
{"title":"A Comparison of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach and Classic Laminectomy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in terms of postoperative back pain.","authors":"Osama A. Khan, M. Khan, M. Azam, Z. Abideen, S. Uddin","doi":"10.52206/JSMC.2021.11.1.45-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Back ground: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common cause of morbidity in elderly patients due to degenerative changes ofspine. Different surgical procedures have been proposed including open lumbar laminectomy and other less invasivedecompressive procedures to minimize soft tissue damage and lessen the post-operative complication. So we conducted thisstudy to find more appropriate and less invasive procedure.Objective: To compare mean post-operative back pain score in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing bilateraldecompression via unilateral approach versus classic laminectomy.Material and Methods: This randomized control trial was carried out in department of neurosurgery, Saidu Teaching HospitalSharif Swat from April 2018 to October 2018.Atotal of 60 patients having confirmed degenerative lumbar spine stenosis with painscore of >5 on Visual Analogue Score (VAS) presenting in outpatient department were included in the study. Patients not willing forthe study and fulfilling the set exclusion criteria were excluded. Patients were divided in two groups randomly on basis of lotterymethod. Written informed consent was taken and VAS at presentation of all patients was recorded. In group Apatient underwentbilateral decompression via unilateral approach. In-group B patient underwent classic laminectomy. Pain evaluation in both groupsvia Visual Analogue Scoring was recorded before surgery and at 1month post-operative follow-up. Follow up was advised at a 2weeks interval and final outcome was measured at 1 month post operatively. Data collected was analyzed through SPSS 22.Results: In our study the mean age of the patients was 59.12±12.88 years, the male to female ratio was 0.9:1. Statistically highlysignificant difference was found between the study groups with pain at 1st month i.e. p-value=0.000.Conclusion: The bilateral decompression via unilateral approach had significantly reduced post-operative pain as compared toclassic laminectomy in patients with LSS.Key words: pain, classic laminectomy, bilateral decompression, unilateral approach, lumbar spinal Stenosis","PeriodicalId":326561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52206/JSMC.2021.11.1.45-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Back ground: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common cause of morbidity in elderly patients due to degenerative changes ofspine. Different surgical procedures have been proposed including open lumbar laminectomy and other less invasivedecompressive procedures to minimize soft tissue damage and lessen the post-operative complication. So we conducted thisstudy to find more appropriate and less invasive procedure.Objective: To compare mean post-operative back pain score in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing bilateraldecompression via unilateral approach versus classic laminectomy.Material and Methods: This randomized control trial was carried out in department of neurosurgery, Saidu Teaching HospitalSharif Swat from April 2018 to October 2018.Atotal of 60 patients having confirmed degenerative lumbar spine stenosis with painscore of >5 on Visual Analogue Score (VAS) presenting in outpatient department were included in the study. Patients not willing forthe study and fulfilling the set exclusion criteria were excluded. Patients were divided in two groups randomly on basis of lotterymethod. Written informed consent was taken and VAS at presentation of all patients was recorded. In group Apatient underwentbilateral decompression via unilateral approach. In-group B patient underwent classic laminectomy. Pain evaluation in both groupsvia Visual Analogue Scoring was recorded before surgery and at 1month post-operative follow-up. Follow up was advised at a 2weeks interval and final outcome was measured at 1 month post operatively. Data collected was analyzed through SPSS 22.Results: In our study the mean age of the patients was 59.12±12.88 years, the male to female ratio was 0.9:1. Statistically highlysignificant difference was found between the study groups with pain at 1st month i.e. p-value=0.000.Conclusion: The bilateral decompression via unilateral approach had significantly reduced post-operative pain as compared toclassic laminectomy in patients with LSS.Key words: pain, classic laminectomy, bilateral decompression, unilateral approach, lumbar spinal Stenosis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧入路双侧减压与经典椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者术后背痛的比较。
背景:腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是由于脊柱退行性改变引起的老年患者发病率的常见原因。不同的手术方法已被提出,包括开放式腰椎椎板切除术和其他侵入性较小的减压手术,以尽量减少软组织损伤和减少术后并发症。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以寻找更合适的微创手术。目的:比较腰椎管狭窄患者行单侧入路减压与经典椎板切除术的平均术后背痛评分。材料与方法:本随机对照试验于2018年4月至2018年10月在斯瓦特沙里夫赛杜教学医院神经外科进行。本研究共纳入60例门诊就诊且视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分大于5分的退行性腰椎管狭窄患者。不愿意参加研究并符合既定排除标准的患者被排除在外。采用抽签法将患者随机分为两组。所有患者就诊时均填写书面知情同意书并进行VAS记录。组患者经单侧入路行双侧减压。B组患者行经典椎板切除术。两组患者术前及术后1个月随访时通过视觉模拟评分进行疼痛评估。建议每隔2周随访一次,术后1个月测量最终结果。收集的数据通过SPSS 22进行分析。结果:本组患者平均年龄59.12±12.88岁,男女比例为0.9:1。第1个月疼痛组间差异有统计学意义,p值=0.000。结论:与经典椎板切除术相比,经单侧入路的双侧减压明显减轻了LSS患者的术后疼痛。关键词:疼痛,经典椎板切除术,双侧减压,单侧入路,腰椎管狭窄
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality Control in Regional Blood Center QC Laboratory Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario Comparison of Color Matching Ability of Dental Students and Dental Graduates using Vita Tooth Guide 3-D Master Serum Zinc and Copper Levels in Children with Thalassemia Major The Efficacy of Phacotrabeculectomy in Reducing Intraocular Pressure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1