Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario

Saif Ud Din Awan, Ayesha Naureen Awan, Nadia Haleem, Hina Fayyaz
{"title":"Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario","authors":"Saif Ud Din Awan, Ayesha Naureen Awan, Nadia Haleem, Hina Fayyaz","doi":"10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.2.782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with advantage of being minimal invasive and being both diagnostic and therapeutic. Objectives: This study was done to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy in a developing world scenario.Material and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted under department of general surgery from September 2019 to August 2021. The patients presenting to the ER department were evaluated based on Alvarado score. Alternate patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA). Based upon clinical and imaging signs of acute appendicitis (i.e. Alvarado score of 7 or more) and consent to be the part of study, were used as inclusion criteria, while pregnancy, patients who could not tolerate increased intra-abdominal pressure/prolonged anesthesia, patients under 10 years of age and patients with evidence of appendicular mass formation were excluded from the study. The standard surgical techniques were performed for both groups and the patients were followed up in immediate post-operative period, at 6 months and one year. Results: The parameters observed were duration of surgery average 25 minutes (range 15-50 mins) for OA and 70 minutes (range 40-90 mins) for LA (P-Value 1.41E-70), return to preoperative activity level was 13 days (range 10-17 days) for OA and 10 days (range 9-14 days) for LA (P-Value 6.69034E-22), and average cost for OA was PKR 35279.00 while for LA was PKR 72168.00 (P-Value 1.24442E-60). Remaining parameters were not significantly different.Conclusion: The evidence available clearly demonstrates that laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in terms of hospital stay, post-operative pain and return to work, however in a few situations the procedure needs to be converted therefore the surgeon must be conversant with open appendectomy for complicated case. Moreover, cost is a major factor determining the choice of procedure specially in the developing countries. Keywords: Appendectomy, Developing world, Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Pakistan,","PeriodicalId":326561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.2.782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with advantage of being minimal invasive and being both diagnostic and therapeutic. Objectives: This study was done to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy in a developing world scenario.Material and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted under department of general surgery from September 2019 to August 2021. The patients presenting to the ER department were evaluated based on Alvarado score. Alternate patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA). Based upon clinical and imaging signs of acute appendicitis (i.e. Alvarado score of 7 or more) and consent to be the part of study, were used as inclusion criteria, while pregnancy, patients who could not tolerate increased intra-abdominal pressure/prolonged anesthesia, patients under 10 years of age and patients with evidence of appendicular mass formation were excluded from the study. The standard surgical techniques were performed for both groups and the patients were followed up in immediate post-operative period, at 6 months and one year. Results: The parameters observed were duration of surgery average 25 minutes (range 15-50 mins) for OA and 70 minutes (range 40-90 mins) for LA (P-Value 1.41E-70), return to preoperative activity level was 13 days (range 10-17 days) for OA and 10 days (range 9-14 days) for LA (P-Value 6.69034E-22), and average cost for OA was PKR 35279.00 while for LA was PKR 72168.00 (P-Value 1.24442E-60). Remaining parameters were not significantly different.Conclusion: The evidence available clearly demonstrates that laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in terms of hospital stay, post-operative pain and return to work, however in a few situations the procedure needs to be converted therefore the surgeon must be conversant with open appendectomy for complicated case. Moreover, cost is a major factor determining the choice of procedure specially in the developing countries. Keywords: Appendectomy, Developing world, Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Pakistan,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中国家阑尾切除术的开腹与腹腔镜手术
背景:腹腔镜手术是一个不断扩展的领域,被公认为胆囊切除术的金标准,它具有微创、诊断和治疗的优势,正被越来越多的外科亚专科采用。研究目的本研究旨在评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术在发展中国家的可行性:本观察性横断面研究于 2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 8 月在普外科进行。根据阿尔瓦拉多评分对急诊科就诊患者进行评估。备用患者接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)和开腹阑尾切除术(OA)。根据急性阑尾炎的临床和影像学征兆(即 Alvarado 评分 7 分或以上)和同意参与研究作为纳入标准,而妊娠、不能耐受腹内压升高/长时间麻醉的患者、10 岁以下的患者和有阑尾肿块形成证据的患者则被排除在研究之外。两组患者均采用标准手术技术,并在术后即刻、6 个月和 1 年对患者进行随访。结果:观察到的参数包括:OA 的手术时间平均为 25 分钟(15-50 分钟不等),LA 的手术时间平均为 70 分钟(40-90 分钟不等)(P-Value 1.41E-70);OA 恢复到术前活动水平的时间为 13 天(10-17 天不等),LA 恢复到术前活动水平的时间为 10 天(9-14 天不等)(P-Value 6.69034E-22);OA 的平均费用为 35279.00 卢比,LA 的平均费用为 72168.00 卢比(P-Value 1.24442E-60)。其余参数无明显差异:现有证据清楚地表明,腹腔镜阑尾切除术在住院时间、术后疼痛和重返工作岗位方面优于开腹阑尾切除术,但在少数情况下需要转换手术方式,因此外科医生必须熟悉复杂病例的开腹阑尾切除术。此外,费用也是决定手术选择的一个主要因素,尤其是在发展中国家。关键词阑尾切除术 发展中国家 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术 巴基斯坦
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality Control in Regional Blood Center QC Laboratory Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario Comparison of Color Matching Ability of Dental Students and Dental Graduates using Vita Tooth Guide 3-D Master Serum Zinc and Copper Levels in Children with Thalassemia Major The Efficacy of Phacotrabeculectomy in Reducing Intraocular Pressure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1