Effects of rhetorical strategies and skin tones on agent persuasiveness in assisted decision-making

Amama Mahmood, Chien-Ming Huang
{"title":"Effects of rhetorical strategies and skin tones on agent persuasiveness in assisted decision-making","authors":"Amama Mahmood, Chien-Ming Huang","doi":"10.1145/3514197.3549628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appearance and linguistic cues may influence how both people and Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVAs) are perceived and evaluated by others; appearance (e.g., skin tone) has been linked to various implicit biases such as agreeing more with stereotypical attractive faces, while particular linguistic cues may effectively increase persuasiveness. In this paper, we report an online study (N=59) evaluating how strategic linguistic cues (expertise: high vs. low) may shape the implicit disadvantages associated with ethnic stereotypes (skin tone: dark vs. light). We found that a virtual agent with a high level of expertise was considered more persuasive, dominant, intelligent, and likeable regardless of their skin tone, and that participants complied more with IVAs with a darker skin tone. Our results suggest that the design of IVAs requires the deliberate considerations of factors such as appearance and linguistic behaviors in order to achieve intended outcomes.","PeriodicalId":149593,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514197.3549628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Appearance and linguistic cues may influence how both people and Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVAs) are perceived and evaluated by others; appearance (e.g., skin tone) has been linked to various implicit biases such as agreeing more with stereotypical attractive faces, while particular linguistic cues may effectively increase persuasiveness. In this paper, we report an online study (N=59) evaluating how strategic linguistic cues (expertise: high vs. low) may shape the implicit disadvantages associated with ethnic stereotypes (skin tone: dark vs. light). We found that a virtual agent with a high level of expertise was considered more persuasive, dominant, intelligent, and likeable regardless of their skin tone, and that participants complied more with IVAs with a darker skin tone. Our results suggest that the design of IVAs requires the deliberate considerations of factors such as appearance and linguistic behaviors in order to achieve intended outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修辞策略和肤色对辅助决策中主体说服力的影响
外观和语言线索可能会影响人们和智能虚拟代理(IVAs)如何被他人感知和评估;外表(如肤色)与各种内隐偏见有关,比如更认同刻板印象中的有吸引力的面孔,而特定的语言线索可能有效地增加说服力。在本文中,我们报告了一项在线研究(N=59),该研究评估了策略性语言线索(专业程度:高vs低)如何塑造与种族刻板印象(肤色:深色vs浅色)相关的隐性劣势。我们发现,无论肤色如何,具有高水平专业知识的虚拟代理都被认为更有说服力、更有统治力、更聪明、更讨人喜欢,而且肤色较深的参与者更遵守IVAs。我们的研究结果表明,IVAs的设计需要慎重考虑外观和语言行为等因素,以达到预期的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reusable virtual coach for smoking cessation and physical activity coaching Effects of rhetorical strategies and skin tones on agent persuasiveness in assisted decision-making Examining the impact of emotion and agency on negotiator behavior Negotiation game to introduce non-linear utility Personality analysis of face swaps: can they be used as avatars?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1