Conceptualising Open Science in the 21st Century

M. Ashepet, Ignace Bossuyt, H.A.M. Brookhuis, Cristian Constantin, Marta Fedele, Naina Goel, D. Pizzolato, Priscilla Van Even, Ana Barbosa Mendes, Anne Snick
{"title":"Conceptualising Open Science in the 21st Century","authors":"M. Ashepet, Ignace Bossuyt, H.A.M. Brookhuis, Cristian Constantin, Marta Fedele, Naina Goel, D. Pizzolato, Priscilla Van Even, Ana Barbosa Mendes, Anne Snick","doi":"10.11116/tdi2021.5.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open Science that is adaptive to the complexity of the 21st century is emerging in transdisciplinary institutions outside of academia. Despite its growing popularity and plurality as a movement, the scope in which Open Science is practiced and discussed inside academia is still mostly\n restricted to the scientific community and fragmented between disciplinary silos. Researchers and policymakers promoting Open Science often focus on knowledge translation and still recognise experts and academia as the main producers of knowledge, essentially closing the research process to\n non-researchers and preventing other perspectives from being integrated into knowledge production. Our aim with this project was to adopt a systems perspective to understand how Open Science can address the challenges in the current knowledge production system. Open discussions among the team\n members revealed distinct understandings of what constitutes Open Science. Thus, during our process we collated these many defi nitions of Open Science and extracted the dimensions that underlie such definitions and mapped how these dimensions could be interconnected in a more comprehensive\n conceptualisation of Open Science. Future iterations of the challenge could build on our reflections and explore how these Open Science dimensions translate into scientific practice and how researchers can be encouraged to reflect on Open Science in a more systems-oriented way. Our findings\n have been summarised in a small video.","PeriodicalId":316049,"journal":{"name":"Transdisciplinary Insights","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transdisciplinary Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11116/tdi2021.5.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open Science that is adaptive to the complexity of the 21st century is emerging in transdisciplinary institutions outside of academia. Despite its growing popularity and plurality as a movement, the scope in which Open Science is practiced and discussed inside academia is still mostly restricted to the scientific community and fragmented between disciplinary silos. Researchers and policymakers promoting Open Science often focus on knowledge translation and still recognise experts and academia as the main producers of knowledge, essentially closing the research process to non-researchers and preventing other perspectives from being integrated into knowledge production. Our aim with this project was to adopt a systems perspective to understand how Open Science can address the challenges in the current knowledge production system. Open discussions among the team members revealed distinct understandings of what constitutes Open Science. Thus, during our process we collated these many defi nitions of Open Science and extracted the dimensions that underlie such definitions and mapped how these dimensions could be interconnected in a more comprehensive conceptualisation of Open Science. Future iterations of the challenge could build on our reflections and explore how these Open Science dimensions translate into scientific practice and how researchers can be encouraged to reflect on Open Science in a more systems-oriented way. Our findings have been summarised in a small video.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21世纪开放科学的概念
适应21世纪复杂性的开放科学正在学术界以外的跨学科机构中兴起。尽管开放科学作为一项运动越来越受欢迎和多元化,但其在学术界的实践和讨论范围仍然主要局限于科学界,并且在学科孤岛之间分散。促进开放科学的研究人员和政策制定者往往把重点放在知识转化上,并且仍然认为专家和学术界是知识的主要生产者,这在本质上将研究过程向非研究人员关闭,并阻止其他观点被整合到知识生产中。我们这个项目的目的是采用系统的视角来理解开放科学如何应对当前知识生产系统中的挑战。团队成员之间的公开讨论揭示了对什么是开放科学的不同理解。因此,在我们的过程中,我们整理了这些开放科学的许多定义,并提取了这些定义背后的维度,并绘制了这些维度如何在更全面的开放科学概念化中相互关联。未来的挑战可以建立在我们反思的基础上,探索这些开放科学维度如何转化为科学实践,以及如何鼓励研究人员以更面向系统的方式反思开放科学。我们的发现已在一个小视频中进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning for the Future: A Case Study of Transdisciplinary Collaboration to Improve Pandemic Preparedness Community Resilience to Muddy Flood Disasters in the Dijle Catchment Region, Belgium: Study Cases of Bertem and Beauvechain Municipalities (Re-)Imagining Neighbourhood Spaces from a Transdisciplinary, Inclusive Research Perspective: The Vaartkom Case Conceptualising Open Science in the 21st Century STE(A)M+: Transforming Higher Education through Collaborative Play
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1