Homologous Use of Umbilical Cord Tissue for Knee Pain

Ruben Berrocal Timmons
{"title":"Homologous Use of Umbilical Cord Tissue for Knee Pain","authors":"Ruben Berrocal Timmons","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-385x-3(6)-099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Injection with homologously-used umbilical cord tissue allograft has not been adequately studied in patients suffering from knee pain.\n\nObjectives: The goal of this study is to determine if knee pain subjects who received cryopreserved umbilical cord tissue (UCT) injected into knee joints experience less knee pain, better function, decreased physical limitations, and reduction of medications (e.g., opiates, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen) over a 6-month period.\n\nMethods: Prior to initiation of this study, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritic Index (WOMAC), and medication usage data were recorded for thirty (30) consenting knee pain subjects receiving UCT at a single site in the United States. Subject profile information was also gathered and utilized to gain further insight into any effects of age, gender, and BMI on pain improvement over time.\n\nResults: Mean resting VAS scores improved from 1.95 to 0.83 over 6 months (p<0.001), while mean VAS scores with activity improved from 6.28 to 2.87 (p<0.001) for the same period. There was no strong evidence of correlation found between gender and VAS scores (resting or with activity). However, there were statistically significant correlations found for both BMI vs. Pre-injection VAS with activity scores (r=0.402, p=.028) and Age vs. Pre-injection VAS with activity scores (r=0.434, p=.017).\n\nMean WOMAC daily activity function scores improved from 44.7 to 18.5 over the same 6 months (p<.001).\n\nOverall, of the patients who used medications at the beginning of the study (18), 77.8% of them reduced or eliminated medication use.\n\nConclusion: Analysis demonstrates that injection with UCT decreases pain, improves physical function, and allows for less medication use for at least 6 months.","PeriodicalId":325610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regenerative Biology and Medicine","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regenerative Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-385x-3(6)-099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Injection with homologously-used umbilical cord tissue allograft has not been adequately studied in patients suffering from knee pain. Objectives: The goal of this study is to determine if knee pain subjects who received cryopreserved umbilical cord tissue (UCT) injected into knee joints experience less knee pain, better function, decreased physical limitations, and reduction of medications (e.g., opiates, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen) over a 6-month period. Methods: Prior to initiation of this study, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritic Index (WOMAC), and medication usage data were recorded for thirty (30) consenting knee pain subjects receiving UCT at a single site in the United States. Subject profile information was also gathered and utilized to gain further insight into any effects of age, gender, and BMI on pain improvement over time. Results: Mean resting VAS scores improved from 1.95 to 0.83 over 6 months (p<0.001), while mean VAS scores with activity improved from 6.28 to 2.87 (p<0.001) for the same period. There was no strong evidence of correlation found between gender and VAS scores (resting or with activity). However, there were statistically significant correlations found for both BMI vs. Pre-injection VAS with activity scores (r=0.402, p=.028) and Age vs. Pre-injection VAS with activity scores (r=0.434, p=.017). Mean WOMAC daily activity function scores improved from 44.7 to 18.5 over the same 6 months (p<.001). Overall, of the patients who used medications at the beginning of the study (18), 77.8% of them reduced or eliminated medication use. Conclusion: Analysis demonstrates that injection with UCT decreases pain, improves physical function, and allows for less medication use for at least 6 months.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脐带组织同源性治疗膝关节疼痛
背景:同种异体脐带组织移植注射在膝关节疼痛患者中的应用尚未得到充分的研究。目的:本研究的目的是确定接受低温保存脐带组织(UCT)注射到膝关节的膝关节疼痛受试者是否在6个月的时间内减轻了膝关节疼痛,改善了功能,减少了身体限制,减少了药物(如阿片类药物,非甾体抗炎药和对乙酰氨基酚)的使用。方法:在本研究开始之前,获得了机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准。视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和药物使用数据记录了美国30名同意在同一地点接受UCT治疗的膝关节疼痛患者。研究人员还收集了受试者资料信息,并利用这些信息进一步了解年龄、性别和BMI对疼痛改善的影响。结果:平均静息VAS评分在6个月内从1.95提高到0.83 (p<0.001),而平均活动VAS评分在6个月内从6.28提高到2.87 (p<0.001)。没有强有力的证据表明性别与VAS评分(休息或活动)之间存在相关性。然而,BMI与注射前VAS的活动评分(r=0.402, p= 0.028)、Age与注射前VAS的活动评分(r=0.434, p= 0.017)均有统计学意义的相关性。在相同的6个月内,平均WOMAC日常活动功能评分从44.7提高到18.5 (p< 0.001)。总体而言,在研究开始时使用药物的患者(18)中,77.8%的患者减少或消除了药物使用。结论:分析表明注射UCT可减轻疼痛,改善身体功能,并可减少至少6个月的药物使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stem Cell Biology on Autoimmune Disease-Crohn’s Disease, Complex Pathogenesis Cure through Regenerative Disease Features of the Course of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Woman with a History of Non-Developing Pregnancy in the Samarkand Region The Role of Glicodelin in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Outcomes of Early Fetal Dimese Public Health: Global and International Health findings Cancer Stem Cells as a Considerable Barrier in Anti-Cancer-Treatments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1