Validity and reliability of a survey to know the technological acceptance of an institutional repository: The case of resources on energy and sustainability

Laura Icela González-Pérez, M. Ramírez-Montoya, F. García-Peñalvo, J. González, A. Llorente
{"title":"Validity and reliability of a survey to know the technological acceptance of an institutional repository: The case of resources on energy and sustainability","authors":"Laura Icela González-Pérez, M. Ramírez-Montoya, F. García-Peñalvo, J. González, A. Llorente","doi":"10.1145/3284179.3284228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to present the validity and reliability of a survey designed for technological acceptance of the Institutional Repository RITEC of Tecnologico de Monterrey with resources on energy and sustainability. The research question to be answered is: how does the user experience influence the success or failure of the acceptance of an Institutional Repository? The survey consists of four points in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): perceived utility (PU), perceived ease of use (EU), attitudes towards use (ATU) and intention to use (BIU). The pilot survey was applied to 47 students enrolled in the virtual course \"Visibility of open knowledge through the RITEC\". The results obtained from the reliability analysis, using Cronbach's alpha index, indicate the high internal consistency of the survey. The validity of the survey focuses on the content validity, valued by a group of experts.","PeriodicalId":370465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the validity and reliability of a survey designed for technological acceptance of the Institutional Repository RITEC of Tecnologico de Monterrey with resources on energy and sustainability. The research question to be answered is: how does the user experience influence the success or failure of the acceptance of an Institutional Repository? The survey consists of four points in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): perceived utility (PU), perceived ease of use (EU), attitudes towards use (ATU) and intention to use (BIU). The pilot survey was applied to 47 students enrolled in the virtual course "Visibility of open knowledge through the RITEC". The results obtained from the reliability analysis, using Cronbach's alpha index, indicate the high internal consistency of the survey. The validity of the survey focuses on the content validity, valued by a group of experts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解机构储存库的技术接受度的调查的有效性和可靠性:能源和可持续性资源的案例
本文的目的是提出一项调查的有效性和可靠性,该调查是为蒙特雷技术机构储存库RITEC的技术接受度而设计的,其中包括能源和可持续性资源。要回答的研究问题是:用户体验如何影响机构存储库接受的成功或失败?该调查由技术接受模型(TAM)中的四个点组成:感知效用(PU),感知易用性(EU),使用态度(ATU)和使用意图(BIU)。这项试点调查对47名参加了“通过RITEC开放知识的可见性”虚拟课程的学生进行了调查。采用Cronbach's alpha指数进行信度分析的结果表明,调查具有较高的内部一致性。调查问卷的效度主要集中在内容效度上,由一组专家进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A complete psychophysiological profile of a Paralympic athlete in a ultraendurance: A case study Design and prototyping by additive manufacturing of a functional splint for rehabilitation of Achilles tendon intrasubstance rupture Experience in the implementation of projects in professional environment in a 1st cycle of studies of Civil Engineering Development and use of mobile technologies that foster students' evaluative judgement: a design-based research Academic digital books: The publishing industry VS Openness in book reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1