{"title":"50 shades of partial information","authors":"A. Pearman","doi":"10.1109/GSIS.2015.7301811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since their origins in the 1980's, grey systems thinking and grey numbers have found a wide and growing range of applications. One of these is in providing decision support for multi-criteria choice. All the key elements of multi-criteria modelling are potentially infused with a lack of certainty: weights on criteria, performance levels of alternatives, choice of criteria, inter-dependence between criteria, and so on. For a long time, multi-criteria researchers have recognised that, especially from a practical point of view, their decision support models are imprecise, that they are often operating with only partial information about the problem they are seeking to solve. And, indeed, in some circumstances, especially in supporting choice between discrete alternatives, models do not need to be precise or based on full provision of information in order to be useful. This has been referred to as decision making with partial information and a wide variety of formalisations of multi-criteria decision making with partial information have been advanced. In this paper, we explore how using grey systems can provide a perspective on multi-criteria choice with partial information that potentially enhances existing thinking and directly relates to the ambiguity and uncertainty of choice - effectively the real world of decision modelling for many application contexts.","PeriodicalId":246110,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GSIS.2015.7301811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since their origins in the 1980's, grey systems thinking and grey numbers have found a wide and growing range of applications. One of these is in providing decision support for multi-criteria choice. All the key elements of multi-criteria modelling are potentially infused with a lack of certainty: weights on criteria, performance levels of alternatives, choice of criteria, inter-dependence between criteria, and so on. For a long time, multi-criteria researchers have recognised that, especially from a practical point of view, their decision support models are imprecise, that they are often operating with only partial information about the problem they are seeking to solve. And, indeed, in some circumstances, especially in supporting choice between discrete alternatives, models do not need to be precise or based on full provision of information in order to be useful. This has been referred to as decision making with partial information and a wide variety of formalisations of multi-criteria decision making with partial information have been advanced. In this paper, we explore how using grey systems can provide a perspective on multi-criteria choice with partial information that potentially enhances existing thinking and directly relates to the ambiguity and uncertainty of choice - effectively the real world of decision modelling for many application contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
50种不同程度的部分信息
自20世纪80年代诞生以来,灰色系统思维和灰色数字已经找到了广泛且不断增长的应用范围。其中之一是为多标准选择提供决策支持。多标准建模的所有关键元素都潜在地注入了确定性的缺乏:标准的权重、可选方案的性能水平、标准的选择、标准之间的相互依赖,等等。长期以来,多标准研究人员已经认识到,特别是从实际的角度来看,他们的决策支持模型是不精确的,他们经常只使用有关他们寻求解决的问题的部分信息。事实上,在某些情况下,特别是在支持在离散的备选方案之间进行选择时,模型不需要精确或基于充分提供的信息才有用。这被称为具有部分信息的决策,并且已经提出了各种具有部分信息的多标准决策的形式化。在本文中,我们探讨了如何使用灰色系统提供多标准选择的视角,这些多标准选择具有部分信息,可能会增强现有的思维,并直接关系到选择的模糊性和不确定性-有效地在许多应用环境中进行决策建模的现实世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-equidistant GM(1,1) model based on GCHM_WBO and its application to corrosion rate prediction Multiple attribute group decision making method based on WGA operator and Grey Incidence Analysis Construction of the evaluation system for regional road traffic safety and application based on a grey integrated evaluation model Average wage, money supply and inflation? empirical analysis based on the grey incidence's degree and the state space model 50 shades of partial information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1