The Impact of Expertise in the Loop for Exploring Machine Rationality

Changkun Ou, S. Mayer, A. Butz
{"title":"The Impact of Expertise in the Loop for Exploring Machine Rationality","authors":"Changkun Ou, S. Mayer, A. Butz","doi":"10.1145/3581641.3584040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-in-the-loop optimization utilizes human expertise to guide machine optimizers iteratively and search for an optimal solution in a solution space. While prior empirical studies mainly investigated novices, we analyzed the impact of the levels of expertise on the outcome quality and corresponding subjective satisfaction. We conducted a study (N=60) in text, photo, and 3D mesh optimization contexts. We found that novices can achieve an expert level of quality performance, but participants with higher expertise led to more optimization iteration with more explicit preference while keeping satisfaction low. In contrast, novices were more easily satisfied and terminated faster. Therefore, we identified that experts seek more diverse outcomes while the machine reaches optimal results, and the observed behavior can be used as a performance indicator for human-in-the-loop system designers to improve underlying models. We inform future research to be cautious about the impact of user expertise when designing human-in-the-loop systems.","PeriodicalId":118159,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Human-in-the-loop optimization utilizes human expertise to guide machine optimizers iteratively and search for an optimal solution in a solution space. While prior empirical studies mainly investigated novices, we analyzed the impact of the levels of expertise on the outcome quality and corresponding subjective satisfaction. We conducted a study (N=60) in text, photo, and 3D mesh optimization contexts. We found that novices can achieve an expert level of quality performance, but participants with higher expertise led to more optimization iteration with more explicit preference while keeping satisfaction low. In contrast, novices were more easily satisfied and terminated faster. Therefore, we identified that experts seek more diverse outcomes while the machine reaches optimal results, and the observed behavior can be used as a performance indicator for human-in-the-loop system designers to improve underlying models. We inform future research to be cautious about the impact of user expertise when designing human-in-the-loop systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环中的专业知识对探索机器合理性的影响
人在环优化利用人的专业知识来指导机器优化器迭代并在解空间中搜索最优解。先前的实证研究主要针对新手,我们分析了专业水平对结果质量和相应主观满意度的影响。我们在文本、照片和3D网格优化上下文中进行了一项研究(N=60)。我们发现,新手可以达到专家水平的质量绩效,但高专业水平的参与者导致更多的优化迭代,更明确的偏好,同时保持较低的满意度。相比之下,新手更容易满足,终止更快。因此,我们确定专家在机器达到最佳结果时寻求更多样化的结果,并且观察到的行为可以用作人在环系统设计人员改进底层模型的性能指标。我们告知未来的研究在设计人在环系统时要谨慎对待用户专业知识的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive User Interface for Dialogue Summarization Human-Centered Deferred Inference: Measuring User Interactions and Setting Deferral Criteria for Human-AI Teams Drawing with Reframer: Emergence and Control in Co-Creative AI Don’t fail me! The Level 5 Autonomous Driving Information Dilemma regarding Transparency and User Experience It Seems Smart, but It Acts Stupid: Development of Trust in AI Advice in a Repeated Legal Decision-Making Task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1