Electron Fractography Pinpoints Cause of Fatigue Fracture

E. A. Lauchner, R. E. Herfert
{"title":"Electron Fractography Pinpoints Cause of Fatigue Fracture","authors":"E. A. Lauchner, R. E. Herfert","doi":"10.31399/asm.fach.modes.c9001537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n After completing a fatigue test of an aluminum alloy component machined from a 7079-T6 forging, technicians noted a 5 in. crack which ran longitudinally above and through the flange. When the fracture face was examined by light microscopy, observers could not ascertain the exact mode of fracture. Electron fractography revealed that five different modes of crack growth were operative as the part failed. Region 1 was a shallow zone (about 0.002 in. at its deepest) of dimpled structure typical of an overload failure. Region 2 was a zone that grew by a stress corrosion mechanism. Through a fatigue mechanism was operative in Region 3, it was not the cause of the large crack. Region 4, which covered 50% of the fracture area, developed mainly by stress corrosion. This zone gradually changed into the combination of intergranular and transgranular overload in Region 5, which covered approximately the remaining 50% of the fracture. Apparently, after stress corrosion moved halfway through, the part failed by overload. This failure analysis proved that a crack, originally thought to be a fatigue failure, was actually a stress corrosion crack.","PeriodicalId":231268,"journal":{"name":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Failure Modes and Mechanisms","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Failure Modes and Mechanisms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.modes.c9001537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After completing a fatigue test of an aluminum alloy component machined from a 7079-T6 forging, technicians noted a 5 in. crack which ran longitudinally above and through the flange. When the fracture face was examined by light microscopy, observers could not ascertain the exact mode of fracture. Electron fractography revealed that five different modes of crack growth were operative as the part failed. Region 1 was a shallow zone (about 0.002 in. at its deepest) of dimpled structure typical of an overload failure. Region 2 was a zone that grew by a stress corrosion mechanism. Through a fatigue mechanism was operative in Region 3, it was not the cause of the large crack. Region 4, which covered 50% of the fracture area, developed mainly by stress corrosion. This zone gradually changed into the combination of intergranular and transgranular overload in Region 5, which covered approximately the remaining 50% of the fracture. Apparently, after stress corrosion moved halfway through, the part failed by overload. This failure analysis proved that a crack, originally thought to be a fatigue failure, was actually a stress corrosion crack.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子断口分析指出疲劳断裂的原因
在完成了7079-T6锻件加工的铝合金部件的疲劳测试后,技术人员注意到5英寸。在法兰上方和穿过的纵向裂缝。当用光学显微镜检查断裂面时,观察者无法确定确切的断裂模式。电子断口分析显示,当零件失效时,有五种不同的裂纹扩展模式。区域1是一个浅层区域(约0.002英寸)。在其最深处)典型的超载失效的凹陷结构。2区是应力腐蚀作用下生长的区域。虽然3区存在疲劳机制,但这并不是造成大裂纹的原因。第4区以应力腐蚀为主,占裂缝面积的50%。该区域在第5区逐渐转变为沿晶和穿晶超载的组合,约覆盖了剩余50%的裂缝。显然,在应力腐蚀进行到一半之后,零件因过载而失效。这一失效分析证明,原来被认为是疲劳失效的裂纹实际上是应力腐蚀裂纹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fatigue Failures, With Special Reference to Fracture Characteristics Dezincification of a Copper Pipe Welded Joint Electron Fractography Pinpoints Cause of Fatigue Fracture Failure of a Hard-Faced Stainless Steel Pump Sleeve Because of Abrasive Wear by River-Water Silt Fatigue Fracture and Weld
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1