PLEDGE: An IoT-oriented Proof-of-Honesty based Blockchain Consensus Protocol

Imran Makhdoom, F. Tofigh, Ian Zhou, M. Abolhasan, J. Lipman
{"title":"PLEDGE: An IoT-oriented Proof-of-Honesty based Blockchain Consensus Protocol","authors":"Imran Makhdoom, F. Tofigh, Ian Zhou, M. Abolhasan, J. Lipman","doi":"10.1109/LCN48667.2020.9314794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing lottery-based consensus algorithms, such as Proof-of-Work, and Proof-of-Stake, are mostly used for blockchain-based financial technology applications. Similarly, the Byzantine Fault Tolerance algorithms do provide consensus finality, yet they are either communications intensive, vulnerable to Denial-of-Service attacks, poorly scalable, or have a low faulty node tolerance level. Moreover, these algorithms are not designed for the Internet of Things systems that require near-real-time transaction confirmation, maximum fault tolerance, and appropriate transaction validation rules. Hence, we propose \"Pledge,\" a unique Proof-of-Honesty based consensus protocol to reduce the possibility of malicious behavior during blockchain consensus. Pledge also introduces the Internet of Things centric transaction validation rules. Initial experimentation shows that Pledge is economical and secure with low communications complexity and low latency in transaction confirmation.","PeriodicalId":245782,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 45th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 45th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN48667.2020.9314794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The existing lottery-based consensus algorithms, such as Proof-of-Work, and Proof-of-Stake, are mostly used for blockchain-based financial technology applications. Similarly, the Byzantine Fault Tolerance algorithms do provide consensus finality, yet they are either communications intensive, vulnerable to Denial-of-Service attacks, poorly scalable, or have a low faulty node tolerance level. Moreover, these algorithms are not designed for the Internet of Things systems that require near-real-time transaction confirmation, maximum fault tolerance, and appropriate transaction validation rules. Hence, we propose "Pledge," a unique Proof-of-Honesty based consensus protocol to reduce the possibility of malicious behavior during blockchain consensus. Pledge also introduces the Internet of Things centric transaction validation rules. Initial experimentation shows that Pledge is economical and secure with low communications complexity and low latency in transaction confirmation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PLEDGE:一个面向物联网的基于诚信证明的区块链共识协议
现有的基于彩票的共识算法,如工作量证明和权益证明,主要用于基于区块链的金融技术应用。类似地,拜占庭容错算法确实提供了共识终结性,但它们要么是通信密集型的,容易受到拒绝服务攻击,可扩展性差,要么具有较低的故障节点容错级别。此外,这些算法不是为需要近实时交易确认、最大容错性和适当交易验证规则的物联网系统设计的。因此,我们提出了“承诺”,这是一种独特的基于诚实证明的共识协议,以减少区块链共识过程中恶意行为的可能性。质押还引入了以物联网为中心的交易验证规则。初步实验表明,Pledge具有经济、安全、通信复杂度低、交易确认延迟低等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leveraging MEC in a 5G System for Enhanced Back Situation Awareness L3SFA: Load Shifting Strategy for Spreading Factor Allocation in LoRaWAN Systems PLEDGE: An IoT-oriented Proof-of-Honesty based Blockchain Consensus Protocol Don’t Stop at the Top: Using Certificate Transparency Logs to Extend Domain Lists for Web Security Studies SETA: Scalable Encrypted Traffic Analytics in Multi-Gbps Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1