RESEARCH ON HISTORICAL PHRASEOLOGY IN UKRAINIAN LINGUISTICS (50s of the XX century – 20s of the XXI century)

V. Denysiuk
{"title":"RESEARCH ON HISTORICAL PHRASEOLOGY IN UKRAINIAN LINGUISTICS (50s of the XX century – 20s of the XXI century)","authors":"V. Denysiuk","doi":"10.37708/ezs.swu.bg.v20i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to analyze the state of studying the formation of the phraseological fund of the Ukrainian language in domestic linguistics. The analysis showed that the traditional approach in Ukrainian studies is to fix the phraseology, clarify its semantics and unite them in groups according to the semantic criterion. In a few studies, the stylistic functions of phraseological units are presented and their comparative analysis in related languages is performed. It was found that the research was performed on the basis of materials of business style written documents of the XIV–XVII centuries, while written documents of other styles serve as a source base much less often or were left out of consideration. The same applies to the time period where the Kyiv Rus’ period is presented in only one study. The analysis of works on historical phraseology showed that in Ukrainian linguistics this trend has not been studied yet. The number of written memorabilia available for research is increasing, while several linguists are currently working on their phraseological system. The traditional method of interpreting phraseology is undergoing transformation: instead of studying phraseology within one style, one can observe its processing through discourse analysis and cross-stylistic parallels, which allows to record metaphorical shifts and determine in which style or genre the phraseologized meaning developed.","PeriodicalId":375728,"journal":{"name":"Ezikov Svyat volume 20 issue 1","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ezikov Svyat volume 20 issue 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/ezs.swu.bg.v20i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article attempts to analyze the state of studying the formation of the phraseological fund of the Ukrainian language in domestic linguistics. The analysis showed that the traditional approach in Ukrainian studies is to fix the phraseology, clarify its semantics and unite them in groups according to the semantic criterion. In a few studies, the stylistic functions of phraseological units are presented and their comparative analysis in related languages is performed. It was found that the research was performed on the basis of materials of business style written documents of the XIV–XVII centuries, while written documents of other styles serve as a source base much less often or were left out of consideration. The same applies to the time period where the Kyiv Rus’ period is presented in only one study. The analysis of works on historical phraseology showed that in Ukrainian linguistics this trend has not been studied yet. The number of written memorabilia available for research is increasing, while several linguists are currently working on their phraseological system. The traditional method of interpreting phraseology is undergoing transformation: instead of studying phraseology within one style, one can observe its processing through discourse analysis and cross-stylistic parallels, which allows to record metaphorical shifts and determine in which style or genre the phraseologized meaning developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰语言学历史用语学研究(20世纪50年代- 21世纪20年代)
本文试图分析国内语言学对乌克兰语词汇资源形成的研究现状。分析表明,乌克兰语研究的传统方法是固定语词,澄清语义学,根据语义学标准将语义学和语义学进行分组。在一些研究中,提出了短语单位的文体功能,并对其在相关语言中的对比分析。研究发现,本研究以十四至十七世纪的商务文体书面文件材料为基础,而其他文体的书面文件作为来源基础的频率要低得多,或者被忽略。这同样适用于基辅罗斯时期只在一项研究中出现的时期。对历史语词学著作的分析表明,乌克兰语言学尚未对这一趋势进行研究。可用于研究的书面纪念品的数量正在增加,而一些语言学家目前正在研究他们的短语系统。传统的短语解释方法正在发生转变:人们可以通过语篇分析和跨风格对比来观察其加工过程,而不是在一种风格中研究短语,这可以记录隐喻的转变,并确定短语化的意义是在哪种风格或类型中发展起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RESEARCH ON HISTORICAL PHRASEOLOGY IN UKRAINIAN LINGUISTICS (50s of the XX century – 20s of the XXI century) TWO PATHS TO BUILDING THE MODERN BULGARIAN NATIONAL MYTHOLOGY: “HADZHI DIMITAR” BY HRISTO BOTEV AND “THE NEW GRAVEYARD ABOVE SLIVNITSA” BY IVAN VAZOV THE HERMENEUTIC POWER OF CHARACTONYMS: A CASE STUDY LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION OF THE TIME CONCEPT IN ENGLISH ORAL NARRATIVE DISCOURSE FROM BALAN TO CHOMSKY – THE FIRST STEPS OF YORDAN PENČEV IN THE BULGARIAN SYNTAX
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1