Comparing the Locational Advantage for Developing Overseas Industrial Park

I. Chang, Jang-Hwan Seong, Yeunwoo Jeong
{"title":"Comparing the Locational Advantage for Developing Overseas Industrial Park","authors":"I. Chang, Jang-Hwan Seong, Yeunwoo Jeong","doi":"10.5804/LHIJ.2013.4.3.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The indices to choose the object countries for developing overseas industrial park were developed and applied in this paper. The results are showing as follows. First, the Korean enterprises are branched out into total 128 countries as of the first quarter of 2010, and the 13 asian countries including China, Vietnam, Japan, and Hongkong shows the majority of precedence 20 countries among the reported during 1980-2010. Second, the 3 steps of selecting the principal region to branch out, establishing assessment indices and criteria, and choosing strategical target counties were developed to choose the countries for developing overseas industrial park. The 38 of 128 countries were selected where the GDP per capita is lower than Korea, and the local reports of incorporation during 2007-2010 are more than 10 times. Then, the 10 countries were excluded where the minimum wages during 2008-2009 are similar to Korean ($815/month). Consequently, the 28 countries including China, Vietnam, and Cambodia etc. were selected as the major target regions. Third, the indices to choose countries for developing overseas industrial park are classified into 5 categories -investment condition, labor market flexibility, potential market demand, population, changing rate of the reported number of manufacturing industry, and detailed indices for each category were selected, then the weight were given with the consideration of importance. Finally, Indonesia, Mongolia, and Uzbekistan were selected as the strategical target counties where acquire the high score in labor market flexibility and investment condition, relatively undeveloped, and friendly to Korea.","PeriodicalId":365439,"journal":{"name":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2013.4.3.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The indices to choose the object countries for developing overseas industrial park were developed and applied in this paper. The results are showing as follows. First, the Korean enterprises are branched out into total 128 countries as of the first quarter of 2010, and the 13 asian countries including China, Vietnam, Japan, and Hongkong shows the majority of precedence 20 countries among the reported during 1980-2010. Second, the 3 steps of selecting the principal region to branch out, establishing assessment indices and criteria, and choosing strategical target counties were developed to choose the countries for developing overseas industrial park. The 38 of 128 countries were selected where the GDP per capita is lower than Korea, and the local reports of incorporation during 2007-2010 are more than 10 times. Then, the 10 countries were excluded where the minimum wages during 2008-2009 are similar to Korean ($815/month). Consequently, the 28 countries including China, Vietnam, and Cambodia etc. were selected as the major target regions. Third, the indices to choose countries for developing overseas industrial park are classified into 5 categories -investment condition, labor market flexibility, potential market demand, population, changing rate of the reported number of manufacturing industry, and detailed indices for each category were selected, then the weight were given with the consideration of importance. Finally, Indonesia, Mongolia, and Uzbekistan were selected as the strategical target counties where acquire the high score in labor market flexibility and investment condition, relatively undeveloped, and friendly to Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展海外工业园区的区位优势比较
在此基础上,提出并应用了选择海外工业园区发展对象国的指标。结果如下:首先,截止到2010年第一季度,韩国企业在128个国家开展了业务,其中中国、越南、日本、香港等13个亚洲国家占据了1980 ~ 2010年报告的前20个国家的大部分。其次,制定了选择主要拓展区域、建立评价指标和标准、选择战略目标县3个步骤,选择海外产业园区发展的国家。在人均国内生产总值(GDP)低于韩国的128个国家中,有38个国家在2007年至2010年期间的当地注册报告超过10倍。然后,将2008 ~ 2009年最低工资水平与韩国相近(每月815美元)的10个国家排除在外。因此,中国、越南、柬埔寨等28个国家被选定为主要目标地区。第三,将选择海外工业园区发展国家的指标分为投资条件、劳动力市场灵活性、潜在市场需求、人口、制造业报告数量变化率5类,并对每一类指标进行了详细的选取,并根据重要性给出了权重。最后,将劳动市场灵活性和投资条件得分较高、相对落后、对韩国友好的印度尼西亚、蒙古、乌兹别克斯坦选定为战略目标国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Self-Sufficiency Criteria for New Town Planning by Network Characteristics Analytical Study on the Pullout Resistance Characteristics of Bored Pile Analysis of Unit-works for Design for Safety in Construction Work : Focus on Construction Projects of OO Corporation An Analysis of Energy Reduction Effects in Housing According to Green Roof Urban Economic Regeneration Strategies of Local Initiative through the Analysis of Regional Strategic Industry Policy Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1