Church-State Relations:Copts between Citizenship, Coptism and Millet System

A. Arafat
{"title":"Church-State Relations:Copts between Citizenship, Coptism and Millet System","authors":"A. Arafat","doi":"10.15640/jppg.v7n1a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the roots of the sectarianism against Coptic Christians and how Coptic-state relations are still revolved aroundthe \"Millet System\", a partnership between the Pope and the president, which has been renovated by president Nasser (1954-1970), consolidated by Mubarak (1981-2011), and revived by president El-Sisi. It also examines different attempts to challenge the \"Millet System\", whether by Pope Shenouda III in the 1970s or by Coptic activists in 2000s. It also addresses how Coptic Church is wavering between\"citizenship\", \"Coptism\" and \"Millet System\". This paper argues that the \"Millet System\" is still institutionalizing Coptic-state relations. Second, the \"Millet System\" is not related to escalation or stopping the sectarian violence against Copts. Third, the popular culture about Christianity resulted from sectarianizing the most conservative elements within the Egyptian society in poor urban and rural areas by the Islamist groups such as the MB, al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group), and Salafist Call, is responsible for sectarianism and for the clash of identifications between Copts and Muslims. Thus, rules and laws sole will not secure Copts from sectarianism, as long as popular culture is still a dominating factor in the Egyptian society and is still able to create such sectarian environment.","PeriodicalId":319606,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF POWER, POLITICS & GOVERNANCE","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF POWER, POLITICS & GOVERNANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15640/jppg.v7n1a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explores the roots of the sectarianism against Coptic Christians and how Coptic-state relations are still revolved aroundthe "Millet System", a partnership between the Pope and the president, which has been renovated by president Nasser (1954-1970), consolidated by Mubarak (1981-2011), and revived by president El-Sisi. It also examines different attempts to challenge the "Millet System", whether by Pope Shenouda III in the 1970s or by Coptic activists in 2000s. It also addresses how Coptic Church is wavering between"citizenship", "Coptism" and "Millet System". This paper argues that the "Millet System" is still institutionalizing Coptic-state relations. Second, the "Millet System" is not related to escalation or stopping the sectarian violence against Copts. Third, the popular culture about Christianity resulted from sectarianizing the most conservative elements within the Egyptian society in poor urban and rural areas by the Islamist groups such as the MB, al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group), and Salafist Call, is responsible for sectarianism and for the clash of identifications between Copts and Muslims. Thus, rules and laws sole will not secure Copts from sectarianism, as long as popular culture is still a dominating factor in the Egyptian society and is still able to create such sectarian environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政教关系:科普特人的公民权、科普特主义与米勒制度
本文探讨了反对科普特基督徒的教派主义的根源,以及科普特国家关系如何仍然围绕着“小米体系”,这是教皇和总统之间的伙伴关系,由纳赛尔总统(1954-1970)翻新,由穆巴拉克(1981-2011)巩固,并由塞西总统恢复。它还考察了挑战“小米制度”的不同尝试,无论是上世纪70年代的教皇谢努达三世(Pope Shenouda III),还是本世纪头十年的科普特活动人士。它也说明了科普特教会如何在“公民权”、“科普特主义”和“小米制度”之间摇摆不定。本文认为,“小米制度”仍在制度化科普特国家关系。其次,“小米制度”与升级或停止针对科普特人的宗派暴力无关。第三,关于基督教的流行文化是由穆斯林兄弟会、al-Jama 'a al-Islamiyya(伊斯兰组织)和萨拉菲斯特呼吁组织等伊斯兰组织将埃及社会中贫穷的城市和农村地区最保守的元素宗派主义所导致的,这些组织对宗派主义和科普特人和穆斯林之间的身份冲突负有责任。因此,只要流行文化仍然是埃及社会的主导因素,并且仍然能够创造这样的宗派环境,那么,规则和法律本身就不能确保科普特人免受宗派主义的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Clan Barriers and Religious Perspectives for Women Political Partic-ipation and Elections in Somaliland Church-State Relations:Copts between Citizenship, Coptism and Millet System Limits to Power Understanding the Clan Barriers and Religious Perspectives for Women Political Participation and Elections in Somaliland Ethnic Tensions, Tantalum, and the Effects of the Global Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1