A Comment on the Ethics Statements of Global Non-Governmental Organizations and their Relation to Sustainable Development Goals

A. M. Adam
{"title":"A Comment on the Ethics Statements of Global Non-Governmental Organizations and their Relation to Sustainable Development Goals","authors":"A. M. Adam","doi":"10.18662/lumproc/gekos2021/01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human endeavors can be understood at the levels of evaluating what is good (values identification) and judging what is right (norms identification). These ethical considerations ideally find expression by becoming embedded in daily activity, with the ideal often buttressed by formal laws and regulations. Commitments to a strategy of sustainable management remain principally an ethical (rather than a regulatory) issue and are addressed primarily by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) rather than states. The United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer a blueprint for a more sustainable future. Faced with the consequences of climate change, natural disasters, environmental degradation, armed conflicts, and mass migration, NGOs’ commitments to the SDGs may be expressed in their engagement with meeting the immediate basic needs of present generations (e.g., for clean air, clean water, food, clothing, and shelter) and by humanitarian or developmental actions (which are part and parcel of sustainability development strategy and its implementation). In the present paper, I will offer a preliminary exploration of the question, to what extent do NGOs’ ethical commitments encompass strategy-led sustainable development capable of contributing to improving the likelihood of survival of a vulnerable population?","PeriodicalId":284884,"journal":{"name":"2nd International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2nd International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gekos2021/01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human endeavors can be understood at the levels of evaluating what is good (values identification) and judging what is right (norms identification). These ethical considerations ideally find expression by becoming embedded in daily activity, with the ideal often buttressed by formal laws and regulations. Commitments to a strategy of sustainable management remain principally an ethical (rather than a regulatory) issue and are addressed primarily by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) rather than states. The United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer a blueprint for a more sustainable future. Faced with the consequences of climate change, natural disasters, environmental degradation, armed conflicts, and mass migration, NGOs’ commitments to the SDGs may be expressed in their engagement with meeting the immediate basic needs of present generations (e.g., for clean air, clean water, food, clothing, and shelter) and by humanitarian or developmental actions (which are part and parcel of sustainability development strategy and its implementation). In the present paper, I will offer a preliminary exploration of the question, to what extent do NGOs’ ethical commitments encompass strategy-led sustainable development capable of contributing to improving the likelihood of survival of a vulnerable population?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球非政府组织伦理声明评析及其与可持续发展目标的关系
人类的努力可以从评价什么是好的(价值认同)和判断什么是正确的(规范认同)两个层面来理解。这些伦理考虑通过融入日常活动而得到理想的表达,而这种理想通常得到正式法律和法规的支持。对可持续管理战略的承诺主要仍然是一个伦理问题(而不是管制问题),主要由非政府组织而不是国家处理。联合国17项可持续发展目标(sdg)为更可持续的未来描绘了蓝图。面对气候变化、自然灾害、环境恶化、武装冲突和大规模移民的后果,非政府组织对可持续发展目标的承诺可能表现在他们参与满足当代人的直接基本需求(例如,清洁的空气、清洁的水、食物、衣服和住所),以及人道主义或发展行动(这是可持续发展战略及其实施的重要组成部分)。在本文中,我将对这个问题进行初步探讨,即非政府组织的道德承诺在多大程度上包含了能够有助于提高弱势群体生存可能性的战略主导的可持续发展?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comment on the Ethics Statements of Global Non-Governmental Organizations and their Relation to Sustainable Development Goals The Life Cycle of Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging from the Perspective of Developing a Sustainable Bioeconomy The „One Health” Concept, the Result of the Application of Bio - Economic and Ethical Management in the Development of a Business in the Fisheries Sector Strategic Process of Recovery and Development of the Romanian Economy Online Ethics During COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1