Performance Analysis of the Circular Folding Cooperative Power Spectral Density Split Cancellation Algorithm for Spectrum Sensing Under Errors at the Quantized Report Channel

E. Almeida, L. S. Costa, R. A. Souza, D. Guimarães
{"title":"Performance Analysis of the Circular Folding Cooperative Power Spectral Density Split Cancellation Algorithm for Spectrum Sensing Under Errors at the Quantized Report Channel","authors":"E. Almeida, L. S. Costa, R. A. Souza, D. Guimarães","doi":"10.1109/LATINCOM.2018.8613244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The circular folding cooperative power spectral density split cancellation (CF-CPSC) algorithm was recently proposed for detecting idle bands in centralized cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio (CR) applications. This algorithm has low complexity and is robust under nonuniform noise. This paper analyzes the performance of the CF-CPSC under quantized and erroneous report channel transmissions. Two approaches has been investigated regarding the CF-CPSC test statistic: i) it is completely computed at the fusion center (FC), and ii) it is partially calculated at each CR for saving report channel resources. In both cases, the information to be reported by the CRs are uniformly quantized and then submitted to errors. Results show that the CF-CPSC is also robust to the quantization and report errors. The second approach is more sensitive to the quantization and report channel errors, but less channel resources are used in comparison with the first approach. The smaller resource usage is achieved by the second approach even with error correcting codes, which increases the amount of data through the report channel. The resource usage achieved by the first approach is larger, even with no error correcting codes.","PeriodicalId":332646,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 10th Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 10th Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LATINCOM.2018.8613244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The circular folding cooperative power spectral density split cancellation (CF-CPSC) algorithm was recently proposed for detecting idle bands in centralized cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio (CR) applications. This algorithm has low complexity and is robust under nonuniform noise. This paper analyzes the performance of the CF-CPSC under quantized and erroneous report channel transmissions. Two approaches has been investigated regarding the CF-CPSC test statistic: i) it is completely computed at the fusion center (FC), and ii) it is partially calculated at each CR for saving report channel resources. In both cases, the information to be reported by the CRs are uniformly quantized and then submitted to errors. Results show that the CF-CPSC is also robust to the quantization and report errors. The second approach is more sensitive to the quantization and report channel errors, but less channel resources are used in comparison with the first approach. The smaller resource usage is achieved by the second approach even with error correcting codes, which increases the amount of data through the report channel. The resource usage achieved by the first approach is larger, even with no error correcting codes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化报告信道误差下频谱感知的圆形折叠协同功率谱密度分割对消算法性能分析
针对认知无线电(CR)应用中集中式协同频谱感知中空闲频段的检测问题,提出了圆形折叠协同功率谱密度分裂对消算法。该算法复杂度低,在非均匀噪声下具有较强的鲁棒性。本文分析了量化信道和误报信道下CF-CPSC的性能。关于CF-CPSC测试统计量,研究了两种方法:i)它完全在融合中心(FC)计算,ii)它在每个CR中部分计算,以节省报告通道资源。在这两种情况下,要由cr报告的信息被统一量化,然后提交给错误。结果表明,CF-CPSC对量化误差和报告误差具有较强的鲁棒性。第二种方法对量化和报告信道误差更敏感,但与第一种方法相比,使用的信道资源更少。通过第二种方法,即使使用纠错代码,也可以实现更小的资源使用,这增加了通过报告通道的数据量。第一种方法使用的资源更大,即使没有纠错码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Convolutional Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images Performance Analysis of SDN Northbound Interfaces Performance of Multiple-Site Diversity and Its Relationship with Time Diversity in Tropical Regions Performance Analysis of the Circular Folding Cooperative Power Spectral Density Split Cancellation Algorithm for Spectrum Sensing Under Errors at the Quantized Report Channel Combining Metrics for Route Selection in SDWSN: Static and Dynamic Approaches Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1