The Specificity of Intertextuality as a Risk Factor of a Communication Failure (on the Example of the Modern German Internet Poetry Discourse)

D. Dacko
{"title":"The Specificity of Intertextuality as a Risk Factor of a Communication Failure (on the Example of the Modern German Internet Poetry Discourse)","authors":"D. Dacko","doi":"10.12737/2587-9103-2023-12-1-25-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the phenomenon of intertextuality as a textual category. The non-recognition of intertextuality can lead to communication failure in dialogic, when the recipient attempts to enter the communicative intention of the sender, as well as at the time of reading, when the recipient is decoding and analyzing the information received. The relevance of the research is determined by the importance of the more detailed study of such means of explication of intertextual connections as allusion and precedent phenomena within the modern German poetry Internet discourse. \nThe aim of research is to identify the means of intertextuality actualization, that are the causes of communication failure in the interpretation of the modern German texts. \nMethodology and research methods. The research work used methods of systematization and generalization of the scientific material, a descriptive-analytical method, the method of lingual-stylistic analysis of the text. \nResults. The article focuses on the polyphony of the German poetry texts, that is expressed in the incorporation of literary and cultural-specific codes. Precedent phenomena and allusions are the sources of communication failures in German poetry discourse and they serve as preferential ways of building intertextual connections in German poems. The author recommends to increase the levels of linguistic and general cultural competence in order to minimize the communicative dissonance, that is a result of the non-recognition of intertextuality. \nScientific novelty lies in the study of the specifics of communication failures on the example of modern German poetry discourse. \nThe practical significance is determined by the possibility of using the obtained scientific results in special university basic courses on translation theory, cognitive linguistics, stylistics and culture of speech, linguo-stylistic interpretation of the text.","PeriodicalId":115195,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Research and Development. Modern Communication Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Research and Development. Modern Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-9103-2023-12-1-25-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the phenomenon of intertextuality as a textual category. The non-recognition of intertextuality can lead to communication failure in dialogic, when the recipient attempts to enter the communicative intention of the sender, as well as at the time of reading, when the recipient is decoding and analyzing the information received. The relevance of the research is determined by the importance of the more detailed study of such means of explication of intertextual connections as allusion and precedent phenomena within the modern German poetry Internet discourse. The aim of research is to identify the means of intertextuality actualization, that are the causes of communication failure in the interpretation of the modern German texts. Methodology and research methods. The research work used methods of systematization and generalization of the scientific material, a descriptive-analytical method, the method of lingual-stylistic analysis of the text. Results. The article focuses on the polyphony of the German poetry texts, that is expressed in the incorporation of literary and cultural-specific codes. Precedent phenomena and allusions are the sources of communication failures in German poetry discourse and they serve as preferential ways of building intertextual connections in German poems. The author recommends to increase the levels of linguistic and general cultural competence in order to minimize the communicative dissonance, that is a result of the non-recognition of intertextuality. Scientific novelty lies in the study of the specifics of communication failures on the example of modern German poetry discourse. The practical significance is determined by the possibility of using the obtained scientific results in special university basic courses on translation theory, cognitive linguistics, stylistics and culture of speech, linguo-stylistic interpretation of the text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互文性的特殊性作为传播失败的风险因素(以现代德国网络诗歌话语为例)
本文将互文性现象作为一种文本范畴来研究。对互文性的不认识会导致在对话中,当接受者试图进入发送者的交际意图时,以及在阅读时,当接受者解码和分析接收到的信息时,交际失败。研究的相关性取决于对现代德国诗歌网络话语中的典故和先例现象等互文联系的解释手段进行更详细研究的重要性。研究的目的是找出互文性的实现手段,这是现代德语文本解释中交际失败的原因。方法论和研究方法。研究工作采用了科学资料的系统化和概括化方法、描述分析方法、语篇语言文体分析方法。结果。本文着重分析了德国诗歌文本的复调性,这种复调性表现在文学和文化特定代码的结合中。先例现象和典故是德语诗歌话语中交际失败的根源,是德语诗歌构建互文联系的首选方式。作者建议提高语言和一般文化能力水平,以尽量减少交际失调,这是不承认互文性的结果。科学的新颖性在于以现代德国诗歌话语为例研究交际失败的具体特征。其实际意义取决于所取得的科学成果在大学翻译理论、认知语言学、语言文体学与语言文化、语篇文体解释等专业基础课程中的应用可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology of Using Cartoons in Teaching Buryat Language to Preschool Children Terminology of the Digital World in the Light of Communication Studies Integration of Multimedia Educational Technologies in Mid-Level Institutions: Practical Experience Mother Language-Based Teaching of the Russian Lexicon to Croatian Students Testing Communicative Competencies of Russian Language Proficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1