Twin Peaks 2.0: Reforming Australia's Financial Regulatory Regime in Light of Failings Exposed by the Banking Royal Commission

A. Schmulow, Karen Fairweather, J. Tarrant
{"title":"Twin Peaks 2.0: Reforming Australia's Financial Regulatory Regime in Light of Failings Exposed by the Banking Royal Commission","authors":"A. Schmulow, Karen Fairweather, J. Tarrant","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3357415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In November 2017 the Federal government established a Royal Commission in Australia’s financial services industry that has become widely known as the Banking Royal Commission. The Commission has, during its hearings and in its recent Interim Report, exposed serious misconduct and poor regulation in Australia’s financial services industry. The authors argue that the recommendation of the 2014 Financial System Inquiry that there be an Assessment Board to provide continuous oversight of the financial regulators, APRA and ASIC, is an effective solution to the regulatory failures exposed by the Banking Royal Commission. The benefits to Australia of the establishment of an Assessment Board are clear, and include enhanced accountability, improvements in the regulator’s culture, prevention of regulatory capture, and enhanced capacity to prevent financial crises. The introduction of an Assessment Board in Australia would serve as a timely and highly effective adjunct to the current Australian Twin Peaks financial regulatory architecture comprising APRA and ASIC.","PeriodicalId":210701,"journal":{"name":"Decision-Making in Public Policy & the Social Good eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision-Making in Public Policy & the Social Good eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In November 2017 the Federal government established a Royal Commission in Australia’s financial services industry that has become widely known as the Banking Royal Commission. The Commission has, during its hearings and in its recent Interim Report, exposed serious misconduct and poor regulation in Australia’s financial services industry. The authors argue that the recommendation of the 2014 Financial System Inquiry that there be an Assessment Board to provide continuous oversight of the financial regulators, APRA and ASIC, is an effective solution to the regulatory failures exposed by the Banking Royal Commission. The benefits to Australia of the establishment of an Assessment Board are clear, and include enhanced accountability, improvements in the regulator’s culture, prevention of regulatory capture, and enhanced capacity to prevent financial crises. The introduction of an Assessment Board in Australia would serve as a timely and highly effective adjunct to the current Australian Twin Peaks financial regulatory architecture comprising APRA and ASIC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双峰2.0:改革澳大利亚的金融监管制度,根据银行皇家委员会暴露的失败
2017年11月,联邦政府在澳大利亚金融服务业成立了一个皇家委员会,该委员会被广泛称为银行皇家委员会。委员会在其听证会和最近的中期报告中,揭露了澳大利亚金融服务业的严重不当行为和监管不力。作者认为,2014年金融系统调查的建议是,有一个评估委员会对金融监管机构APRA和ASIC进行持续监督,这是对银行皇家委员会暴露的监管失败的有效解决方案。设立评估委员会对澳大利亚的好处是显而易见的,包括加强问责制,改善监管机构的文化,防止监管俘获,提高预防金融危机的能力。在澳大利亚引入一个评估委员会,将作为当前澳大利亚双峰金融监管架构(包括APRA和ASIC)的及时和高效的辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling yield distribution for parametric crop insurance The Mercurial Commitment: Revisiting the Unintended Consequence of Military Humanitarian Intervention and Anti-atrocity Norms Financing the Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Regret-Free Truth-Telling in School Choice with Consent Promoting Cooperation in Collective Actions: Evidence from the Reserve Fund for Maintenance in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1