Comparative and Development of Network Information Teaching and Traditional Teaching Methods

Hongmei Tian
{"title":"Comparative and Development of Network Information Teaching and Traditional Teaching Methods","authors":"Hongmei Tian","doi":"10.1145/3482632.3483135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the gradual enrichment of the theory and practice of information-based teaching, the proportion of network information-based teaching methods is increasing, but the traditional teaching methods are weakened. The traditional teaching method for students to master the basic knowledge and skills of the system has its effect can not be ignored, but it ignores the initiative of students as cognitive subjects, is not conducive to the formation of students' innovative development and cooperation and communication ability and creative ability. Network information teaching method will be a student-centered, comprehensive and diversified development of students, and can promote the common progress of education and teachers and students. The implementation of the two teaching methods is quite controversial, so the analysis and comparison is particularly important. This paper first expounds the importance and inevitability of this study from the significance of the times and national policy support. Using questionnaire survey, data analysis and literature analysis to compare and analyze the network information teaching and traditional teaching methods, from the development and selection of teaching methods and the teaching effect and satisfaction brought by teaching methods. This paper adopts questionnaire survey and data analysis method, 70% of the teachers choose the traditional teaching methods, in terms of satisfaction and learning interest, the information-based teaching methods tend to be extreme, the data tends to both ends, the data of the traditional teaching methods tends to be stable, and then comes to the limitations of the development of network information-based teaching and the stability of the development of traditional teaching methods.","PeriodicalId":165101,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3482632.3483135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the gradual enrichment of the theory and practice of information-based teaching, the proportion of network information-based teaching methods is increasing, but the traditional teaching methods are weakened. The traditional teaching method for students to master the basic knowledge and skills of the system has its effect can not be ignored, but it ignores the initiative of students as cognitive subjects, is not conducive to the formation of students' innovative development and cooperation and communication ability and creative ability. Network information teaching method will be a student-centered, comprehensive and diversified development of students, and can promote the common progress of education and teachers and students. The implementation of the two teaching methods is quite controversial, so the analysis and comparison is particularly important. This paper first expounds the importance and inevitability of this study from the significance of the times and national policy support. Using questionnaire survey, data analysis and literature analysis to compare and analyze the network information teaching and traditional teaching methods, from the development and selection of teaching methods and the teaching effect and satisfaction brought by teaching methods. This paper adopts questionnaire survey and data analysis method, 70% of the teachers choose the traditional teaching methods, in terms of satisfaction and learning interest, the information-based teaching methods tend to be extreme, the data tends to both ends, the data of the traditional teaching methods tends to be stable, and then comes to the limitations of the development of network information-based teaching and the stability of the development of traditional teaching methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络信息教学与传统教学方法的比较与发展
随着信息化教学理论和实践的逐渐丰富,网络信息化教学方法所占的比重越来越大,而传统的教学方法却被削弱了。传统的教学方法对于学生掌握系统的基本知识和技能有其不可忽视的作用,但它忽视了学生作为认知主体的主动性,不利于学生创新发展、合作沟通能力和创造能力的形成。网络信息教学方法将以学生为中心,全面、多元地发展学生,并能促进教育和师生的共同进步。两种教学方法的实施颇有争议,因此分析比较显得尤为重要。本文首先从时代意义和国家政策支持两方面阐述了本研究的重要性和必然性。采用问卷调查法、数据分析法和文献分析法对网络信息化教学与传统教学方法进行比较分析,从教学方法的发展和选择以及教学方法带来的教学效果和满意度等方面进行分析。本文采用问卷调查和数据分析的方法,70%的教师选择传统教学方法,在满意度和学习兴趣方面,信息化教学方法趋于极端,数据趋于两头,传统教学方法的数据趋于稳定,进而得出网络信息化教学发展的局限性和传统教学方法发展的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Implementation of Archive Management System Based on Cloud Computing Big Data Research on Optimization of sports tourism route planning based on KDD from the perspective of knowledge map Unbiased Least Squares Regression Coefficients for Multiple Linear Regression Mathematical Models Research on the Factors of Rice Consumption Demand Based on LDA-GRA Analysis Analysis of English Machine Translation Standards of Professional Terms under Big Data Context Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1