Authoritarianism and Support for Populist Radical Right Parties

Erik R. Tillman
{"title":"Authoritarianism and Support for Populist Radical Right Parties","authors":"Erik R. Tillman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896223.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the relationship between authoritarianism and the likelihood of voting for populist radical right parties in Western Europe. Radical right parties share an ideology based around nativism, authoritarianism, and populism. This ideology appeals to high authoritarians because it promises tough measures to preserve social cohesion, so high authoritarians are more likely to vote for radical right parties. This prediction is tested using national election study data from a range of West European countries. The results show that high authoritarians are more likely to vote for radical right parties, but even more so if they have weaker attachments to the political mainstream. The final set of analyses examines whether economic anxieties or anti-immigration attitudes moderate this relationship. While economic anxieties matter little to radical right party support, high authoritarians who oppose immigration are more likely to vote for a radical right party. These findings build on existing research by providing a stronger explanation of previous findings linking anti-immigration attitudes or cultural anxieties to radical right party support.","PeriodicalId":246016,"journal":{"name":"Authoritarianism and the Evolution of West European Electoral Politics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authoritarianism and the Evolution of West European Electoral Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896223.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This chapter examines the relationship between authoritarianism and the likelihood of voting for populist radical right parties in Western Europe. Radical right parties share an ideology based around nativism, authoritarianism, and populism. This ideology appeals to high authoritarians because it promises tough measures to preserve social cohesion, so high authoritarians are more likely to vote for radical right parties. This prediction is tested using national election study data from a range of West European countries. The results show that high authoritarians are more likely to vote for radical right parties, but even more so if they have weaker attachments to the political mainstream. The final set of analyses examines whether economic anxieties or anti-immigration attitudes moderate this relationship. While economic anxieties matter little to radical right party support, high authoritarians who oppose immigration are more likely to vote for a radical right party. These findings build on existing research by providing a stronger explanation of previous findings linking anti-immigration attitudes or cultural anxieties to radical right party support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威权主义和对民粹主义极右翼政党的支持
本章考察了专制主义与西欧民粹主义极右翼政党投票可能性之间的关系。激进右翼政党的意识形态基于本土主义、威权主义和民粹主义。这种意识形态对高级权威人士很有吸引力,因为它承诺采取强硬措施来保持社会凝聚力,因此高级权威人士更有可能投票给激进的右翼政党。这一预测是用一系列西欧国家的国家选举研究数据来检验的。结果显示,高度威权主义者更有可能投票给激进的右翼政党,但如果他们对政治主流的依恋程度较低,则更有可能投票给激进右翼政党。最后一组分析考察了经济焦虑或反移民态度是否缓和了这种关系。虽然经济焦虑对极右翼政党的支持影响不大,但反对移民的高级独裁者更有可能投票给极右翼政党。这些发现建立在现有研究的基础上,为之前的研究结果提供了更有力的解释,这些研究结果将反移民态度或文化焦虑与激进右翼政党的支持联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Authoritarianism and Support for Populist Radical Right Parties Authoritarianism and Potential Support for the Radical Right in Ireland Threat to National Community? West European Politics in Turmoil? Cultural Backlash or Worldview Evolution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1