Radiation-induced change after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations

Hak Su Lee, Hae Yu Kim, Sun-il Lee, J. Woo, Sung-Chul Jin, Moo Seong Kim
{"title":"Radiation-induced change after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations","authors":"Hak Su Lee, Hae Yu Kim, Sun-il Lee, J. Woo, Sung-Chul Jin, Moo Seong Kim","doi":"10.52662/jksfn.2023.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Radiation-induced change (RIC) on magnetic resonance imaging after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is not rare. We reviewed patients who underwent GKRS for AVMs and analyzed the results and factors associated with RIC.Methods: We reviewed 189 patients who underwent GKRS for AVMs between October 2002 and August 2017. All patients were followed up for at least 3 years. This study included 111 males and 78 females (mean age, 39.63 years; range, 3–79 years). Nineteen patients underwent pre-GKRS embolization. Seventy-six patients had ruptured AVMs and 113 had unruptured AVMs. We analyzed obliteration and RIC occurrence rates. Several demographic and clinical factors were analyzed to determine the influence of AVM obliteration on RIC occurrence.Results: The overall obliteration rate (OR) was 72.49% (137/189) at the final follow-up. The actuarial OR was 55.5% 36 months after GKRS. The overall RIC occurrence rate was 28.04% (53/189), and the actuarial RIC occurrence rate was 26.8% 24 months after GKRS. The OR showed a statistically significant difference according to AVM rupture (p<0.01) and sex (p<0.01). The RIC occurrence rate was significantly associated with AVM rupture (p<0.01), lesion volume (p=0.04), and treatment volume (p=0.03). Other factors showed statistically non-significant relationships.Conclusion: The overall OR after GKRS for AVMs was comparable to the results of other previous reports. RIC is a common postoperative outcome following GKRS for AVMs. In this study, the OR was higher in ruptured AVMs and male patients, whereas RIC occurred more frequently in larger and unruptured AVMs.","PeriodicalId":193825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52662/jksfn.2023.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Radiation-induced change (RIC) on magnetic resonance imaging after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is not rare. We reviewed patients who underwent GKRS for AVMs and analyzed the results and factors associated with RIC.Methods: We reviewed 189 patients who underwent GKRS for AVMs between October 2002 and August 2017. All patients were followed up for at least 3 years. This study included 111 males and 78 females (mean age, 39.63 years; range, 3–79 years). Nineteen patients underwent pre-GKRS embolization. Seventy-six patients had ruptured AVMs and 113 had unruptured AVMs. We analyzed obliteration and RIC occurrence rates. Several demographic and clinical factors were analyzed to determine the influence of AVM obliteration on RIC occurrence.Results: The overall obliteration rate (OR) was 72.49% (137/189) at the final follow-up. The actuarial OR was 55.5% 36 months after GKRS. The overall RIC occurrence rate was 28.04% (53/189), and the actuarial RIC occurrence rate was 26.8% 24 months after GKRS. The OR showed a statistically significant difference according to AVM rupture (p<0.01) and sex (p<0.01). The RIC occurrence rate was significantly associated with AVM rupture (p<0.01), lesion volume (p=0.04), and treatment volume (p=0.03). Other factors showed statistically non-significant relationships.Conclusion: The overall OR after GKRS for AVMs was comparable to the results of other previous reports. RIC is a common postoperative outcome following GKRS for AVMs. In this study, the OR was higher in ruptured AVMs and male patients, whereas RIC occurred more frequently in larger and unruptured AVMs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伽玛刀放射治疗脑动静脉畸形后放射诱导的改变
目的:伽玛刀放射治疗脑动静脉畸形(AVMs)后磁共振成像的辐射诱导改变(RIC)并不少见。我们回顾了因avm而接受GKRS的患者,并分析了与RIC相关的结果和因素。方法:我们回顾了2002年10月至2017年8月期间接受GKRS治疗AVMs的189例患者。所有患者均随访至少3年。本研究纳入男性111例,女性78例,平均年龄39.63岁;范围3-79年)。19例患者行gkrs前栓塞。76例avm破裂,113例avm未破裂。我们分析了闭塞和RIC的发生率。分析了几种人口统计学和临床因素,以确定AVM闭塞对RIC发生的影响。结果:末次随访时,总闭塞率(OR)为72.49%(137/189)。GKRS后36个月的精算OR为55.5%。GKRS后24个月,总RIC发生率为28.04%(53/189),精算RIC发生率为26.8%。根据AVM破裂的不同,OR差异有统计学意义(p<0.01),性别差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。RIC发生率与AVM破裂(p<0.01)、病变体积(p=0.04)、治疗体积(p=0.03)相关。其他因素没有统计学上的显著关系。结论:GKRS治疗AVMs后的总体OR与以往报道的结果相当。RIC是avm GKRS术后常见的结果。在本研究中,破裂的动静脉畸形和男性患者的OR更高,而在较大和未破裂的动静脉畸形中,RIC发生的频率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robotic surgery for microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a feasibility study Stereotactic brain biopsy of John Cunningham virus-polymerase chain reaction-negative progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a case report Changes in theta and gamma oscillations of the medial prefrontal cortex following hippocampal-focused ultrasound stimulation The first treatment option for secondary trigeminal neuralgia: open surgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery Radiation-induced change after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1