Who needs category theory?

Bull. EATCS Pub Date : 2018-01-31 DOI:10.29007/4dr3
A. Blass, Y. Gurevich
{"title":"Who needs category theory?","authors":"A. Blass, Y. Gurevich","doi":"10.29007/4dr3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In mathematical applications, category theory remains a contentious issue, with enthusiastic fans and a skeptical majority. In a muted form this split applies to the authors of this note. When we learned that the only mathematically sound foundation of topological quantum computing in the literature is based on category theory, the skeptical author suggested to \"decategorize\" the foundation. But we discovered, to our surprise, that category theory (or something like it) is necessary for the purpose, for computational reasons. The goal of this note is to give a high-level explanation of that necessity, which avoids details and which suggests that the case of topological quantum computing is far from unique.","PeriodicalId":388781,"journal":{"name":"Bull. EATCS","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bull. EATCS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/4dr3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In mathematical applications, category theory remains a contentious issue, with enthusiastic fans and a skeptical majority. In a muted form this split applies to the authors of this note. When we learned that the only mathematically sound foundation of topological quantum computing in the literature is based on category theory, the skeptical author suggested to "decategorize" the foundation. But we discovered, to our surprise, that category theory (or something like it) is necessary for the purpose, for computational reasons. The goal of this note is to give a high-level explanation of that necessity, which avoids details and which suggests that the case of topological quantum computing is far from unique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁需要范畴论?
在数学应用中,范畴论仍然是一个有争议的问题,有热情的粉丝和持怀疑态度的大多数。以一种柔和的形式,这种分裂适用于本笔记的作者。当我们了解到文献中拓扑量子计算的唯一数学基础是基于范畴论时,持怀疑态度的作者建议“去分类”这个基础。但令我们惊讶的是,我们发现范畴论(或类似的理论)对于计算来说是必要的。本文的目的是对这种必要性给出一个高层次的解释,它避免了细节,并表明拓扑量子计算的情况远非独一无二。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tutorial for computer scientists on finite extensive games with perfect information Regular Languages: To Finite Automata and Beyond Succinct Descriptions and Optimal Simulations Splicing Who needs category theory? Space in Weak Propositional Proof Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1