Latin America faces Eurasian conflicts: assessing regional responses in the age of Russia — United States tensions

A. G. Levaggi
{"title":"Latin America faces Eurasian conflicts: assessing regional responses in the age of Russia — United States tensions","authors":"A. G. Levaggi","doi":"10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the ‘August’ crisis in 2008 to the high-scale intervention in the Syrian Civil War there had been increasing tensions between Russia and West that changed the global geopolitical scenario. The bulk of the literature has focused mostly on the bilateral relations between the U.S. and the Russian Federation, and its strategic implications in conflictive regional orders such as the Post-Soviet Space, Middle East and the Black Sea region. By looking at the international impact of regional conflicts in Central Eurasia, this paper seeks to shed light on the strategic triangle in the Western Hemisphere which brings Latin America, next to Washington and Moscow. By using a systemic framework, this article argues that rising tension between US and Russia affects not only the strategic calculations of Latin American chancelleries but also the type of Moscow’s regional strategy which would be more prone to emphasize geopolitical over economic factors, affecting negatively the degree of Russian influence in the region. To assess these arguments, I present two types of empirical elements. On the one hand, I present data about UN General Assembly voting in the 1991–2015 period which shows that there had been a decline in the voting agreement between Latin America and Russia in the last decade, while the region has improved its engagement with the US. On the other hand, I analyze briefly how Argentina, Mexico and Brazil vote in the specific cases of the Georgian and Ukrainian conflicts at the UN General Assembly and UN Security Council.","PeriodicalId":336122,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International relations","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the ‘August’ crisis in 2008 to the high-scale intervention in the Syrian Civil War there had been increasing tensions between Russia and West that changed the global geopolitical scenario. The bulk of the literature has focused mostly on the bilateral relations between the U.S. and the Russian Federation, and its strategic implications in conflictive regional orders such as the Post-Soviet Space, Middle East and the Black Sea region. By looking at the international impact of regional conflicts in Central Eurasia, this paper seeks to shed light on the strategic triangle in the Western Hemisphere which brings Latin America, next to Washington and Moscow. By using a systemic framework, this article argues that rising tension between US and Russia affects not only the strategic calculations of Latin American chancelleries but also the type of Moscow’s regional strategy which would be more prone to emphasize geopolitical over economic factors, affecting negatively the degree of Russian influence in the region. To assess these arguments, I present two types of empirical elements. On the one hand, I present data about UN General Assembly voting in the 1991–2015 period which shows that there had been a decline in the voting agreement between Latin America and Russia in the last decade, while the region has improved its engagement with the US. On the other hand, I analyze briefly how Argentina, Mexico and Brazil vote in the specific cases of the Georgian and Ukrainian conflicts at the UN General Assembly and UN Security Council.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁美洲面临欧亚冲突:评估俄美紧张时代的区域反应
从2008年的“8月”危机到对叙利亚内战的大规模干预,俄罗斯和西方之间的紧张关系不断加剧,改变了全球地缘政治格局。大部分文献主要集中在美国和俄罗斯联邦之间的双边关系,以及其在后苏联空间、中东和黑海地区等冲突地区秩序中的战略影响。通过观察欧亚大陆中部地区冲突的国际影响,本文试图阐明西半球的战略三角关系,该三角关系将拉丁美洲与华盛顿和莫斯科相邻。通过使用系统框架,本文认为,美俄之间不断上升的紧张局势不仅影响了拉美各国总理的战略计算,而且还影响了莫斯科的地区战略类型,这种战略更倾向于强调地缘政治而不是经济因素,从而对俄罗斯在该地区的影响力产生负面影响。为了评估这些论点,我提出了两种类型的经验要素。一方面,我提供了1991年至2015年期间联合国大会投票的数据,这些数据表明,在过去十年中,拉丁美洲与俄罗斯之间的投票协议有所下降,而该地区改善了与美国的接触。另一方面,我简要分析了阿根廷、墨西哥和巴西在格鲁吉亚和乌克兰冲突的具体情况下在联合国大会和联合国安理会的投票情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foreign economic cooperation between St. Petersburg and Denmark in the 21st century: Main trends, problems, prospects The pandemic, Russia and the West Russian — US public diplomacy: Comparative aspects and dialogue prospects Conferences on political modeling: Simulating European Union — Eurasian Economic Union negotiations Russian-American relations in a changing world: A new contribution to the discussion on the future of international order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1