Eddy Imanuel Doloksaribu, T. LidwinaMaria, A. Swantoro, Tisa Windayani
{"title":"Tinjauan terhadap Pelaksanaan Peraturan Daerah Sumatera Barat No. 9/2014 tentang Serah Simpan Karya Cetak dan Karya Rekam","authors":"Eddy Imanuel Doloksaribu, T. LidwinaMaria, A. Swantoro, Tisa Windayani","doi":"10.25170/PERKOTAAN.V10I2.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe effort to acknowledge as well as to protect intellectual works have been done not only in the view of protecting the so-called intellectual property rights but also preserving the works itself. For the later, the attempt is represented in Law No 4/1990 which obligate publishers and recording companies to deposit a stipulated number of copies of their work in determined libraries. This national level policy followed by quite a lot of provinces resulting in the formation of regional regulations concerning the same matter. However, only few of those use criminal law instrument. Since this is a multiperspective research, Regional Regulations of Sumatera Barat No. 9/2014 is deemed to fit the study because it comprises criminal provisions, business law aspects, and also private law issues. This research examines the implementation of the law from three standpoints: i) the implementation of the criminal provisions, ii) how its implementation protects the rights of the owner of the works as well as their benefit from the view of business law, and iii) the private legal relation between the parties of deposit arrangements. The research found that: i) the criminal provisions have not been enforced because the authority has not been equipped by civil investigator; ii) Dinas Kearsipan&Perpustakaan Kota Padang has done full effort in registering the works in order to have them deposited in the library, eventhough constraints related to budget delimitates the attempt. By this reason the protection and benefit for the owner has not been fully achieved; iii) there is neither special agreement nor any arrangement found in the relation between parties. \n \nKeywords: implementation of Perda Sumbar No 9/2014; intellectual works deposite.","PeriodicalId":252540,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Perkotaan","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Perkotaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/PERKOTAAN.V10I2.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract
The effort to acknowledge as well as to protect intellectual works have been done not only in the view of protecting the so-called intellectual property rights but also preserving the works itself. For the later, the attempt is represented in Law No 4/1990 which obligate publishers and recording companies to deposit a stipulated number of copies of their work in determined libraries. This national level policy followed by quite a lot of provinces resulting in the formation of regional regulations concerning the same matter. However, only few of those use criminal law instrument. Since this is a multiperspective research, Regional Regulations of Sumatera Barat No. 9/2014 is deemed to fit the study because it comprises criminal provisions, business law aspects, and also private law issues. This research examines the implementation of the law from three standpoints: i) the implementation of the criminal provisions, ii) how its implementation protects the rights of the owner of the works as well as their benefit from the view of business law, and iii) the private legal relation between the parties of deposit arrangements. The research found that: i) the criminal provisions have not been enforced because the authority has not been equipped by civil investigator; ii) Dinas Kearsipan&Perpustakaan Kota Padang has done full effort in registering the works in order to have them deposited in the library, eventhough constraints related to budget delimitates the attempt. By this reason the protection and benefit for the owner has not been fully achieved; iii) there is neither special agreement nor any arrangement found in the relation between parties.
Keywords: implementation of Perda Sumbar No 9/2014; intellectual works deposite.
对知识作品的承认和保护,已经不仅仅是从保护所谓的知识产权的角度出发,而是从保护作品本身的角度出发。对于后者,第4/1990号法律规定出版商和唱片公司必须将规定数量的作品存放在指定的图书馆。这一国家层面的政策被相当多的省份遵循,导致形成了关于同一问题的地区法规。然而,只有少数国家使用刑事法律文书。由于这是一个多视角的研究,苏门答腊巴拉第9/2014号区域法规被认为适合研究,因为它包括刑事规定,商法方面,也包括私法问题。本研究从三个角度考察该法律的实施:1)刑事条款的实施;2)从商业法的角度来看,该法律的实施如何保护作品所有人的权利及其利益;3)保证金安排各方之间的私人法律关系。研究发现:1)由于没有配备民事侦查人员,刑事规定没有得到执行;ii) Dinas Kearsipan&Perpustakaan Kota Padang已经尽了最大的努力为这些作品注册,以便将它们存入图书馆,尽管与预算有关的限制限制了这种尝试。因此,对业主的保护和利益没有得到充分实现;(三)双方关系中不存在特别约定或安排。关键词:Perda Sumbar No 9/2014实施;智力作品库。