Control-flow guided clause generation for property directed reachability

Xian Li, K. Schneider
{"title":"Control-flow guided clause generation for property directed reachability","authors":"Xian Li, K. Schneider","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2016.7748250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Property directed reachability (PDR) has been introduced as a very efficient verification method for synchronous hardware circuits which is based on induction rather than fixpoint computation. The method incrementally refines a sequence of clause sets that over-approximate the states that are reachable in finitely many steps. Even being valid, safety properties may not be provable by induction due to so-called counterexamples to induction (CTIs) that result from the over-approximation of the reachable states. Crucial steps of the PDR method therefore consist of (1) deciding about the reachability of states derived from counterexamples, and (2) generalizing them to clauses that cover as many unreachable states as possible that are then excluded from consideration by adding the generated clause to the reachable state approximation sequence. In this paper, we describe a refinement of the PDR method for synchronous programs that makes effective use of the distinction between the control- and dataflow of synchronous programs. If a CTI candidate is found, we reduce it to its control-flow part and check whether the obtained control-flow states are unreachable in the corresponding extended finite state machine of the program. If so, we can immediately exclude all these states by adding the negation of the control-flow part as a new clause to the current reachable state approximations; otherwise, the usual steps of the PDR method are applied. This additional step in the PDR method is not expensive, and can significantly increase the performance of PDR.","PeriodicalId":166427,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2016.7748250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Property directed reachability (PDR) has been introduced as a very efficient verification method for synchronous hardware circuits which is based on induction rather than fixpoint computation. The method incrementally refines a sequence of clause sets that over-approximate the states that are reachable in finitely many steps. Even being valid, safety properties may not be provable by induction due to so-called counterexamples to induction (CTIs) that result from the over-approximation of the reachable states. Crucial steps of the PDR method therefore consist of (1) deciding about the reachability of states derived from counterexamples, and (2) generalizing them to clauses that cover as many unreachable states as possible that are then excluded from consideration by adding the generated clause to the reachable state approximation sequence. In this paper, we describe a refinement of the PDR method for synchronous programs that makes effective use of the distinction between the control- and dataflow of synchronous programs. If a CTI candidate is found, we reduce it to its control-flow part and check whether the obtained control-flow states are unreachable in the corresponding extended finite state machine of the program. If so, we can immediately exclude all these states by adding the negation of the control-flow part as a new clause to the current reachable state approximations; otherwise, the usual steps of the PDR method are applied. This additional step in the PDR method is not expensive, and can significantly increase the performance of PDR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为属性定向可达性生成控制流引导子句
属性定向可达性(PDR)是一种基于归纳而非定点计算的同步硬件电路的有效验证方法。该方法逐步细化一系列子句集,这些子句集过度逼近在有限多个步骤中可到达的状态。即使是有效的,由于所谓的归纳反例(CTIs),安全性质可能无法通过归纳证明,这是由可达状态的过度逼近造成的。因此,PDR方法的关键步骤包括:(1)决定从反例中得出的状态的可达性,以及(2)将它们概括为涵盖尽可能多的不可达状态的子句,然后通过将生成的子句添加到可达状态近似序列中来排除这些子句。在本文中,我们描述了同步程序的PDR方法的改进,该方法有效地利用了同步程序的控制流和数据流之间的区别。如果发现CTI候选项,则将其简化为其控制流部分,并检查获得的控制流状态在程序的相应扩展有限状态机中是否不可达。如果是这样,我们可以通过将控制流部分的否定作为新子句添加到当前可达状态近似中来立即排除所有这些状态;否则,应用PDR方法的常规步骤。PDR方法中的这个附加步骤并不昂贵,而且可以显著提高PDR的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formal semantics of behavior specifications in the architecture analysis and design language standard Probabilistic reachability analysis of the tap withdrawal circuit in caenorhabditis elegans Control-flow guided clause generation for property directed reachability Automatically adjusting system level designs after RTL/gate-level ECO Brain-computer interface using P300: a gaming approach for neurocognitive impairment diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1