The Module Validity of The Sub-Material Utilization of Medicinal Plant Biodiversity

Widia Vinaloka, Syamswisna Syamswisna, A. Tenriawaru
{"title":"The Module Validity of The Sub-Material Utilization of Medicinal Plant Biodiversity","authors":"Widia Vinaloka, Syamswisna Syamswisna, A. Tenriawaru","doi":"10.18592/tarbiyah.v11i2.7231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of the module as a sub-material for the use of biodiversity for class X SMA. Using Research and Development (R&D) research methods with a qualitative descriptive approach. This study validated the instrument and validated the module teaching materials. The selection of validators with purposive sampling technique which consists of 5 validators. Module validation to obtain quantitative data accurately through a Likert scale. The assessment aspect of the module contains the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics. The validation results obtained through the validator were analyzed using the CVR formula and continued to CVI, the results of the analysis of 4 aspects of the assessment namely the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics consisting of 15 indicators of module feasibility assessment obtained a CVI value of 0.99 which is said to be a valid module and proper to use.The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of the module as a sub-material for the use of biodiversity for class X SMA. Using Research and Development (R&D) research methods with a qualitative descriptive approach. This study validated the instrument and validated the module teaching materials. The selection of validators with purposive sampling technique which consists of 5 validators. Module validation to obtain quantitative data accurately through a Likert scale. The assessment aspect of the module contains the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics. The validation results obtained through the validator were analyzed using the CVR formula and continued to CVI, the results of the analysis of 4 aspects of the assessment namely the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics consisting of 15 indicators of module feasibility assessment obtained a CVI value of 0.99 which is said to be a valid module and proper to use.","PeriodicalId":288343,"journal":{"name":"Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v11i2.7231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of the module as a sub-material for the use of biodiversity for class X SMA. Using Research and Development (R&D) research methods with a qualitative descriptive approach. This study validated the instrument and validated the module teaching materials. The selection of validators with purposive sampling technique which consists of 5 validators. Module validation to obtain quantitative data accurately through a Likert scale. The assessment aspect of the module contains the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics. The validation results obtained through the validator were analyzed using the CVR formula and continued to CVI, the results of the analysis of 4 aspects of the assessment namely the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics consisting of 15 indicators of module feasibility assessment obtained a CVI value of 0.99 which is said to be a valid module and proper to use.The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of the module as a sub-material for the use of biodiversity for class X SMA. Using Research and Development (R&D) research methods with a qualitative descriptive approach. This study validated the instrument and validated the module teaching materials. The selection of validators with purposive sampling technique which consists of 5 validators. Module validation to obtain quantitative data accurately through a Likert scale. The assessment aspect of the module contains the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics. The validation results obtained through the validator were analyzed using the CVR formula and continued to CVI, the results of the analysis of 4 aspects of the assessment namely the feasibility of content, language, presentation, and graphics consisting of 15 indicators of module feasibility assessment obtained a CVI value of 0.99 which is said to be a valid module and proper to use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药用植物生物多样性子物质利用的模块有效性研究
该研究的目的是确定该模块作为X类SMA生物多样性使用的子材料的可行性。采用研究与开发(R&D)研究方法,采用定性描述方法。本研究对仪器进行了验证,对模块教材进行了验证。验证器的选择采用有目的抽样技术,由5个验证器组成。模块验证,通过李克特量表准确获得定量数据。模块的评估方面包括内容、语言、演示和图形的可行性。通过验证器得到的验证结果,使用CVR公式进行分析并继续进行CVI,对模块可行性评估的15个指标组成的内容可行性、语言可行性、呈现可行性、图形可行性4个方面的评估结果进行分析,得出CVI值为0.99,认为模块有效,适合使用。该研究的目的是确定该模块作为X类SMA生物多样性使用的子材料的可行性。采用研究与开发(R&D)研究方法,采用定性描述方法。本研究对仪器进行了验证,对模块教材进行了验证。验证器的选择采用有目的抽样技术,由5个验证器组成。模块验证,通过李克特量表准确获得定量数据。模块的评估方面包括内容、语言、演示和图形的可行性。通过验证器得到的验证结果,使用CVR公式进行分析并继续进行CVI,对模块可行性评估的15个指标组成的内容可行性、语言可行性、呈现可行性、图形可行性4个方面的评估结果进行分析,得出CVI值为0.99,认为模块有效,适合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Correlation Between Learning Facility, Learning Time and Parental Guidance at Home to The Students’ English Learning Achievement نمط تطوير المنهج الدراسي لقسم تعليم اللغة العربية على أساس تكنولوجيا المعلومات نظريا وتطبيقيا The Module Validity of The Sub-Material Utilization of Medicinal Plant Biodiversity HOTS-Speed Test Integrated Quantum Learning Model: Can Improve Mathematical Concept Mastery? The Effectiveness of Using Reality Augmented Media to Increase The Students’ Learning Motivation in Chemical Bonding Material
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1