INCORPORATING MULTILITERACIES AND MULTIMODALITY INTO LITERACY INSTRUCTION FOR EFL STUDENTS AT A TERTIARY LEVEL: A CASE STUDY

Diana Lj. Prodanović Stankić, Bojana M. Jakovljević
{"title":"INCORPORATING MULTILITERACIES AND MULTIMODALITY INTO LITERACY INSTRUCTION FOR EFL STUDENTS AT A TERTIARY LEVEL: A CASE STUDY","authors":"Diana Lj. Prodanović Stankić, Bojana M. Jakovljević","doi":"10.21618/fil2225068p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In EFL, developing literacy is primarily based on improving reading skills, which is quite problematic for millennials, regardless of their proficiency levels, since they seem to be more used to video input than texts. Drawing on the theoretical concept of multiliteracies (New London Group 1996), introduced to outline a specific pedagogic framework for rethinking the future of language education, this paper discusses the results of a study conducted at the Department of English Studies, University of Novi Sad. The main aim of the study was to identify and determine the primary problems students majoring in English have while doing reading text-based comprehension tasks, and to compare the results with comprehension tasks that combine text and video input. Even though teaching and learning are by definition multimodal, particularly in the field of EFL, since both processes imply the use of different modes (speech, writing, gesture, image, sound), at higher levels of education these modes do not seem to be equally present. This study suggests some theoretical and practical directions towards integrating multimodal approaches in developing literacy in order to promote positive learning outcomes of EFL students.","PeriodicalId":197643,"journal":{"name":"Филолог – часопис за језик књижевност и културу","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Филолог – часопис за језик књижевност и културу","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2225068p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In EFL, developing literacy is primarily based on improving reading skills, which is quite problematic for millennials, regardless of their proficiency levels, since they seem to be more used to video input than texts. Drawing on the theoretical concept of multiliteracies (New London Group 1996), introduced to outline a specific pedagogic framework for rethinking the future of language education, this paper discusses the results of a study conducted at the Department of English Studies, University of Novi Sad. The main aim of the study was to identify and determine the primary problems students majoring in English have while doing reading text-based comprehension tasks, and to compare the results with comprehension tasks that combine text and video input. Even though teaching and learning are by definition multimodal, particularly in the field of EFL, since both processes imply the use of different modes (speech, writing, gesture, image, sound), at higher levels of education these modes do not seem to be equally present. This study suggests some theoretical and practical directions towards integrating multimodal approaches in developing literacy in order to promote positive learning outcomes of EFL students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将多元读写和多模态融入高等教育英语学生的读写教学:个案研究
在英语中,培养读写能力主要是基于提高阅读技能,这对千禧一代来说是相当有问题的,不管他们的熟练程度如何,因为他们似乎更习惯于视频输入而不是文本。借鉴多元素养的理论概念(New London Group 1996),概述了一个重新思考语言教育未来的具体教学框架,本文讨论了诺维萨德大学英语研究系进行的一项研究的结果。本研究的主要目的是识别和确定英语专业学生在进行基于文本的阅读理解任务时存在的主要问题,并将结果与文本和视频输入相结合的理解任务进行比较。尽管根据定义,教学和学习是多模态的,特别是在EFL领域,因为这两个过程都意味着使用不同的模式(说话、写作、手势、图像、声音),但在更高层次的教育中,这些模式似乎并不平等。本研究提出了一些理论和实践方向,以整合多模态方法培养学生的读写能力,从而促进学生的积极学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANIMAL SIMILES EXPRESSING HUMAN TRAITS IN ENGLISH AND SERBIAN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SERBIAN ORTHODOX PRIESTS AND MONKS IN THE 19THAND 20TH -CENTURY SERBIAN LITERATURE PHRASEOLOGISMS IN THE NOVEL MEDEA. VOICES BY CHRISTA WOLF – ORIGINAL AND TRANSLATION. A CONTRIBUTION TO DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN CONSTRUCTIVE PHRASEOLOGY AND TRANSLATOLOGY A DISCURSIVE APPROACH TO TEACHING GERMAN LITERATURE ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE NOVEL BRICKS AND MORTAR BY CLEMENS MEYER FORSTER’S ITALIAN NOVELS AS A TESTGROUND FOR A PASSAGE TO INDIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1