Is safety culture in differing organizations the same thing? a comparison of safety culture measures in three organizations

J. Harvey, G. Erdos, H. Jackson, Selina Dennison
{"title":"Is safety culture in differing organizations the same thing? a comparison of safety culture measures in three organizations","authors":"J. Harvey, G. Erdos, H. Jackson, Selina Dennison","doi":"10.1080/14664530490896690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety culture is a complex issue; while there would seem to be a consensus about what it means in general terms, there is still no agreement concerning the actual number of its constituent factors, which range from 2 to 19 but almost always include management responsibility, job satisfaction, individual responsibility, leadership style and communication, commitment, risk awareness, and risk taking. Most research has concentrated on industry sectors where the salience of safety is high and it is possible that safety attitudes may differ in those industries where safety has a lower salience. There is also the possibility that to some extent safety culture factors are method-bound—the factors are as much a product of the items in the scale as they are of an underlying factor structure. This study uses two measures of safety culture and considers the factor structures for three industry groups—one in the nuclear industry, one in chemicals, and one in manufacturing. In the nuclear and manufacturing companies ...","PeriodicalId":212131,"journal":{"name":"Risk Decision and Policy","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Decision and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14664530490896690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Safety culture is a complex issue; while there would seem to be a consensus about what it means in general terms, there is still no agreement concerning the actual number of its constituent factors, which range from 2 to 19 but almost always include management responsibility, job satisfaction, individual responsibility, leadership style and communication, commitment, risk awareness, and risk taking. Most research has concentrated on industry sectors where the salience of safety is high and it is possible that safety attitudes may differ in those industries where safety has a lower salience. There is also the possibility that to some extent safety culture factors are method-bound—the factors are as much a product of the items in the scale as they are of an underlying factor structure. This study uses two measures of safety culture and considers the factor structures for three industry groups—one in the nuclear industry, one in chemicals, and one in manufacturing. In the nuclear and manufacturing companies ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同组织的安全文化是一样的吗?三个组织安全文化措施的比较
安全文化是一个复杂的问题;虽然人们似乎对它的一般含义达成了共识,但对于其构成因素的实际数量仍然没有达成一致,范围从2到19,但几乎总是包括管理责任,工作满意度,个人责任,领导风格和沟通,承诺,风险意识和冒险。大多数研究集中在安全重要性高的工业部门,在安全重要性较低的工业部门,安全态度可能会有所不同。在某种程度上,安全文化因素也有可能受到方法的限制——这些因素既是量表中项目的产物,也是潜在因素结构的产物。本研究采用了安全文化的两种衡量标准,并考虑了三个行业群体的因素结构——一个是核工业,一个是化学品,一个是制造业。在核能和制造业公司中……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-attribute decision making and public perceptions of risk in relation to large scale environmental projects Is safety culture in differing organizations the same thing? a comparison of safety culture measures in three organizations Risk events and learning from error: when are assessments of the risk of unemployment revised? On not wanting to know and not wanting to inform others: choices regarding predictive genetic testing Making decisions for incident management in nuclear power plants using probabilistic safety assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1