{"title":"Prediction of carotid pressure waveforms by mathematical transformation of pressure waves recorded from the radial artery","authors":"I. Rauchberger, A. Dart, M. Cohen","doi":"10.1109/ICBEM.1998.666443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radial pressure waves (RPWs) and carotid pressure waves (CPWs) were recorded using applanation tonometry in 6 healthy subjects (5M, 1F, all aged 21 yrs) at rest as well as after a vasodilator agent (sublingual glyceryl trinitrate [GTN] spray). For each subject, transfer functions between radial and carotid pressure waves were calculated by a nonparametric Fourier method. Using the transfer functions, CPWs were reconstructed from RPWs and compared to tonometrically recorded CPWs. The transfer functions accurately predicted CPWs at rest, however, post-GTN, there were significant differences between reconstructed and recorded CPWs. The timing of peak systolic pressure, as predicted by the reconstructed CPWs, was underestimated by 0.3% at rest and was overestimated by 2.3% post-GTN spray.","PeriodicalId":213764,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism (Cat. No.98TH8269)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism (Cat. No.98TH8269)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBEM.1998.666443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Radial pressure waves (RPWs) and carotid pressure waves (CPWs) were recorded using applanation tonometry in 6 healthy subjects (5M, 1F, all aged 21 yrs) at rest as well as after a vasodilator agent (sublingual glyceryl trinitrate [GTN] spray). For each subject, transfer functions between radial and carotid pressure waves were calculated by a nonparametric Fourier method. Using the transfer functions, CPWs were reconstructed from RPWs and compared to tonometrically recorded CPWs. The transfer functions accurately predicted CPWs at rest, however, post-GTN, there were significant differences between reconstructed and recorded CPWs. The timing of peak systolic pressure, as predicted by the reconstructed CPWs, was underestimated by 0.3% at rest and was overestimated by 2.3% post-GTN spray.