Comparing ISI and Non-ISI Iranian Medical Research Articles written in English

Nilofar Bayandor, Vizayaletchumi Pauline Roslin
{"title":"Comparing ISI and Non-ISI Iranian Medical Research Articles written in English","authors":"Nilofar Bayandor, Vizayaletchumi Pauline Roslin","doi":"10.47176/SJMSHM.3.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this study was to see if any major difference(s) existed between ISI and Non-ISI English medical research articles in their application of major moves. To this effect, 36 randomly selected online articles from each group were subjected to analysis using Fryer‟s moves analysis framework. These articles were chosen on the basis of ease of accessibility, publication frequency and reputation. To test the hypotheses of this study, a Chi-Square Test of Independence was run to see if there were any significant differences between the number of moves employed in each section of ISI articles with those found in non-ISI articles. Overall, findings revealed that articles in both groups had significantly adhered to the major moves specified in the study‟s framework. Detail descriptive data analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in the use of Move11 (State the Limitation). It was found that 72% of the researchers in Type 1(ISI journals) had described the limitations of their studies while only36% of the authors in articles of Type 2(Non-ISI journals) had done so. However, the most striking similarities were seen in Move1 (Present Background Knowledge) and Move 12 (Conclusion). These moves were employed by all the articles in both Types of journals. In addition, two new moves named, Introduce Methods (M3) in the Introduction Section and Sample Selection (M6) in the Method Section were identified during analysis. Though the use of M3 was found to be insignificant, M6 was used by more than half of the articles in both groups. Overall, it was concluded that since articles in both groups had significantly adhered to the major moves specified in the study framework, other underlying criteria besides the application of common moves may exist in choosing articles to be published in Iranian ISI medical journals. These findings contribute to genre research and provide input for further analysis in this context.","PeriodicalId":123659,"journal":{"name":"SRPH Journal of Medical Sciences and Healthcare Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPH Journal of Medical Sciences and Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/SJMSHM.3.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to see if any major difference(s) existed between ISI and Non-ISI English medical research articles in their application of major moves. To this effect, 36 randomly selected online articles from each group were subjected to analysis using Fryer‟s moves analysis framework. These articles were chosen on the basis of ease of accessibility, publication frequency and reputation. To test the hypotheses of this study, a Chi-Square Test of Independence was run to see if there were any significant differences between the number of moves employed in each section of ISI articles with those found in non-ISI articles. Overall, findings revealed that articles in both groups had significantly adhered to the major moves specified in the study‟s framework. Detail descriptive data analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in the use of Move11 (State the Limitation). It was found that 72% of the researchers in Type 1(ISI journals) had described the limitations of their studies while only36% of the authors in articles of Type 2(Non-ISI journals) had done so. However, the most striking similarities were seen in Move1 (Present Background Knowledge) and Move 12 (Conclusion). These moves were employed by all the articles in both Types of journals. In addition, two new moves named, Introduce Methods (M3) in the Introduction Section and Sample Selection (M6) in the Method Section were identified during analysis. Though the use of M3 was found to be insignificant, M6 was used by more than half of the articles in both groups. Overall, it was concluded that since articles in both groups had significantly adhered to the major moves specified in the study framework, other underlying criteria besides the application of common moves may exist in choosing articles to be published in Iranian ISI medical journals. These findings contribute to genre research and provide input for further analysis in this context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较ISI和非ISI用英语写的伊朗医学研究文章
本研究的主要目的是观察ISI和非ISI英文医学研究文章在主要步进的应用上是否存在重大差异。为此,从每组中随机选择36篇在线文章,使用Fryer的移动分析框架进行分析。这些文章是根据易获取性、发表频率和声誉来选择的。为了检验本研究的假设,我们进行了卡方独立性检验,以查看ISI文章的每个部分中使用的移动数量与非ISI文章中的移动数量之间是否存在显著差异。总的来说,研究结果表明,两组的文章都明显遵循了研究框架中规定的主要步骤。详细的描述性数据分析显示,两组在Move11的使用上存在显著差异(State the Limitation)。研究发现,在第一类(ISI期刊)中,72%的研究人员描述了他们研究的局限性,而在第二类(非ISI期刊)的文章中,只有36%的作者这样做了。然而,最惊人的相似之处出现在Move1 (Present Background Knowledge)和Move 12 (Conclusion)。这两种期刊的所有文章都采用了这些方法。此外,在分析过程中还发现了两个新动作,分别是Introduction Section中的Introduction Methods (M3)和Method Section中的Sample Selection (M6)。虽然M3的使用被发现是微不足道的,但两组中超过一半的文章都使用了M6。总的来说,得出的结论是,由于两组的文章都明显遵循了研究框架中规定的主要步骤,在选择发表在伊朗ISI医学期刊上的文章时,除了适用共同步骤外,可能还存在其他基本标准。这些发现有助于类型研究,并为这一背景下的进一步分析提供了输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of High-Intensity Treadmill Training on Motor Function in Patients with a Stroke Effectiveness of Supportive and Educational Group Therapy on Mental Health Improvement of Mothers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Investigating the Pattern of Direct Medical Costs of Covid-19 Patients in Hospitals of Ilam Province Comparing ISI and Non-ISI Iranian Medical Research Articles written in English Compare coping styles and marital satisfaction in the patients with the bipolar disorder with the normal people
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1