Engineering students' preferences for active and non-active learning strategies in the classroom

J. Pow-Sang
{"title":"Engineering students' preferences for active and non-active learning strategies in the classroom","authors":"J. Pow-Sang","doi":"10.1109/ICACIT53544.2021.9612487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instructors employ different teaching and learning strategies in the classroom. Although they traditionally give lectures to teach a topic, some of them also use active learning strategies. The literature shows the advantages of using active learning strategies compared to traditional teaching; however, there could be some resistance in their application between students and teachers. This paper shows part of the results of a study that focuses on investigating factors that can influence the adoption of active learning in the classroom in computing and engineering undergraduate programs. A questionnaire was applied to engineering students at a Peruvian university to determine their preferences in the teaching-learning strategies used by lecturers in the classroom. In general, it was observed that students positively value active and non-active (or traditional) learning strategies.","PeriodicalId":442925,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Symposium on Accreditation of Engineering and Computing Education (ICACIT)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Symposium on Accreditation of Engineering and Computing Education (ICACIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACIT53544.2021.9612487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instructors employ different teaching and learning strategies in the classroom. Although they traditionally give lectures to teach a topic, some of them also use active learning strategies. The literature shows the advantages of using active learning strategies compared to traditional teaching; however, there could be some resistance in their application between students and teachers. This paper shows part of the results of a study that focuses on investigating factors that can influence the adoption of active learning in the classroom in computing and engineering undergraduate programs. A questionnaire was applied to engineering students at a Peruvian university to determine their preferences in the teaching-learning strategies used by lecturers in the classroom. In general, it was observed that students positively value active and non-active (or traditional) learning strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工科学生在课堂上对主动和非主动学习策略的偏好
教师在课堂上采用不同的教学策略。虽然他们传统上是通过讲座来教授一个主题,但他们中的一些人也使用主动学习策略。文献表明,与传统教学相比,使用主动学习策略具有优势;然而,在他们的应用中,学生和老师之间可能会有一些阻力。本文展示了一项研究的部分结果,该研究的重点是调查影响计算机和工程本科课程在课堂上采用主动学习的因素。对秘鲁一所大学的工科学生进行了问卷调查,以确定他们对讲师在课堂上使用的教学策略的偏好。总的来说,我们观察到学生积极地重视主动和非主动(或传统)学习策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engineering students' preferences for active and non-active learning strategies in the classroom Mathematical modeling and development of variational thinking in engineering students Accreditation of engineering programs during the pandemic period: An evaluative approach Control and follow-up of engineering programs: a path for international accreditation Influential factors in the desertion of electronic engineering students from UPTC admitted in 2015
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1