Insight by Metaphor – The Epistemic Role of Metaphor in Science

N. Kompa
{"title":"Insight by Metaphor – The Epistemic Role of Metaphor in Science","authors":"N. Kompa","doi":"10.1515/9783110481112-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My aim in this paper is to investigate the epistemic functions metaphors might perform. According to a traditionally influential idea metaphors have, at best, ornamental value; they are poetic or rhetorical devices, used to please or even sway people. Current research in philosophy, linguistics and psychology shows the need for a refined picture of what purposes metaphors might serve. Expressions are commonly used metaphorically in order to conceptualize abstract and mental phenomena. The expressions thereby employed are often taken from the realm of sense experience; we feel blue, or complain about someone being cold, and so on. Yet even in the natural sciences metaphors have added epistemic value. They direct our attention to phenomena that we did not hitherto notice, make us think thoughts that we did not think before, etc. More specifically, I will claim that metaphors have heuristic, exploratory and explanatory value. Nonetheless, some metaphors are more successful than others. I will close by advancing various criteria for metaphorical success and failure. Metaphor, it seems, is a matter of teaching an old word new tricks. (Nelson Goodman)","PeriodicalId":167138,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Literature","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110481112-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to investigate the epistemic functions metaphors might perform. According to a traditionally influential idea metaphors have, at best, ornamental value; they are poetic or rhetorical devices, used to please or even sway people. Current research in philosophy, linguistics and psychology shows the need for a refined picture of what purposes metaphors might serve. Expressions are commonly used metaphorically in order to conceptualize abstract and mental phenomena. The expressions thereby employed are often taken from the realm of sense experience; we feel blue, or complain about someone being cold, and so on. Yet even in the natural sciences metaphors have added epistemic value. They direct our attention to phenomena that we did not hitherto notice, make us think thoughts that we did not think before, etc. More specifically, I will claim that metaphors have heuristic, exploratory and explanatory value. Nonetheless, some metaphors are more successful than others. I will close by advancing various criteria for metaphorical success and failure. Metaphor, it seems, is a matter of teaching an old word new tricks. (Nelson Goodman)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐喻的洞察力——隐喻在科学中的认知作用
本文的目的是探讨隐喻可能发挥的认知功能。根据一种传统的有影响力的观点,隐喻至多有观赏价值;它们是诗意的或修辞的手段,用来取悦甚至动摇人们。目前在哲学、语言学和心理学方面的研究表明,需要对隐喻可能达到的目的有一个清晰的认识。表达通常用于隐喻,以便将抽象和心理现象概念化。这里所使用的表达方式往往取自感官经验的领域;我们感到沮丧,或者抱怨某人很冷,等等。然而,即使在自然科学中,隐喻也增加了认知价值。它们把我们的注意力引向我们迄今为止没有注意到的现象,使我们思考我们以前没有思考过的想法,等等。更具体地说,我将声称隐喻具有启发式,探索性和解释性价值。然而,有些隐喻比其他的更成功。最后,我将提出隐喻性成功和失败的各种标准。隐喻,似乎是一个教旧词新把戏的问题。(尼尔森古德曼)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Paradoxical Interplay of Exactitude and Indefiniteness Insight by Metaphor – The Epistemic Role of Metaphor in Science Author and Editor Directory The Making of A Mystic Dream of 4 Establishing Evidence through a Shift in Viewpoint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1