Design and Psychometrics of a Tool for Assessing Clinical Skills of Using "Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition

Z. Kahani, J. Abolghasemi, Younes Amiri Shavaki, Mohammad Sadegh Jenabi, S. Maroufi
{"title":"Design and Psychometrics of a Tool for Assessing Clinical Skills of Using \"Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition","authors":"Z. Kahani, J. Abolghasemi, Younes Amiri Shavaki, Mohammad Sadegh Jenabi, S. Maroufi","doi":"10.32598/fdj.4.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: The Severity of Stuttering Instrument-fourth edition (SSI-4) form can be used to assess the severity of stuttering. In this study, in order to increase students’ competence and objectively assess their clinical skills, the validity and reliability of the DOPS test in assessing the clinical skills of speech therapy students in using the SSI-4 form were assessed. Methods: This study was a non-interventional descriptive study conducted in the School of Rehabilitation Sciences. Nineteen students were selected by the census method. An evaluation checklist related to the DOPS method was prepared. After obtaining the consent and training of students and examiners on the implementation of the DOPS assessment method, the student’s work was observed by the examiners and rated, and then the student’s strengths and weaknesses were given feedback. Results: The results showed that the questions are related to the measured subject and have high face validity. The content validity index was more than 0.9, and the content validity ratio was more than 0.6. The results confirmed the test's reliability and indicated the optimal internal structure of the test and its structural validity. Conclusion: According to this study, the use of the DOPS test to objectively assess the clinical skills of speech therapy students in the assessment of stuttering is appropriate and according to the results, DOPS has appropriate validity and reliability and this test can be used clinically.","PeriodicalId":330157,"journal":{"name":"Function and Disability Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Function and Disability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/fdj.4.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The Severity of Stuttering Instrument-fourth edition (SSI-4) form can be used to assess the severity of stuttering. In this study, in order to increase students’ competence and objectively assess their clinical skills, the validity and reliability of the DOPS test in assessing the clinical skills of speech therapy students in using the SSI-4 form were assessed. Methods: This study was a non-interventional descriptive study conducted in the School of Rehabilitation Sciences. Nineteen students were selected by the census method. An evaluation checklist related to the DOPS method was prepared. After obtaining the consent and training of students and examiners on the implementation of the DOPS assessment method, the student’s work was observed by the examiners and rated, and then the student’s strengths and weaknesses were given feedback. Results: The results showed that the questions are related to the measured subject and have high face validity. The content validity index was more than 0.9, and the content validity ratio was more than 0.6. The results confirmed the test's reliability and indicated the optimal internal structure of the test and its structural validity. Conclusion: According to this study, the use of the DOPS test to objectively assess the clinical skills of speech therapy students in the assessment of stuttering is appropriate and according to the results, DOPS has appropriate validity and reliability and this test can be used clinically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计和心理测量的工具,用于评估临床技能使用“口吃严重程度仪器-第四版
背景与目的:口吃严重程度量表第四版(SSI-4)可用于评估口吃的严重程度。本研究为了提高学生的能力,客观地评价学生的临床技能,对DOPS测验在使用SSI-4表格评估语言治疗学生临床技能方面的效度和信度进行了评估。方法:本研究是在康复科学学院进行的一项非介入性描述性研究。通过人口普查的方法选出了19名学生。编制了与DOPS方法有关的评价清单。在获得学生和考官对实施DOPS考核方法的同意和培训后,由考官对学生的作业进行观察和评分,并反馈学生的优缺点。结果:所测问题与被测对象相关,具有较高的面效度。内容效度指标大于0.9,内容效度比大于0.6。结果证实了试验的信度,指出了试验的最优内部结构及其结构效度。结论:本研究认为,使用DOPS测验客观评价言语治疗学生在口吃评估中的临床技能是合适的,根据结果,DOPS具有适当的效度和信度,可以在临床上使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perception and Experiences of Rehabilitation Service Providers of Teamwork Barriers in Tehran Province, Iran The Relationship Between Balance and Fine Motor Skills in Children With Intellectual Disability Gap in Noise Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Systematic Review The Effect of Vocal Warm up and Cool Down Exercises on the Acoustic Characteristics in Speech and Language Pathologists: A Pilot Study Application of the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) in Psychosocial Needs of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1