Gap in Noise Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Systematic Review

Mitra Ghorbani, Mohammad Maarefvand, Mahsa Sepehrnejad
{"title":"Gap in Noise Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Systematic Review","authors":"Mitra Ghorbani, Mohammad Maarefvand, Mahsa Sepehrnejad","doi":"10.32598/fdj.6.262.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: The gap in noise auditory brainstem responses (GIN-ABR) is a valuable assessment tool for auditory temporal processing, offering non-invasive and objective measurements encompassing the entire auditory system from the cochlea to the brainstem. This method has been utilized in investigating various factors, including age-related effects, hearing loss, and tinnitus. This systematic review was conducted to present a thorough examination of (GIN-ABR), encompassing its methodology, applications, and inherent limitations. Methods: This study was conducted based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane, PubMed, and Ovid databases were used to extract English articles from 1990 to June 2023. The search terms used were “gap in noise auditory brainstem response”, “ABR gap detection”, “ABR gap duration”, “ABR gap threshold”, and “ABR temporal processing”. Articles were included if gap-evoked ABR was used, investigating the effect of any factor on the responses, and using any gapped stimulus type. Articles whose evoked potentials did not include ABR waves were excluded. The outcome of interest was gap-evoked ABR in different participant groups. Results: A total of 10 studies were deemed suitable for inclusion in the review. The articles were reviewed that including the study population, the methods, and the results. Despite the variability in the results of the studies, in the aged group, longer latency shifts and decreased peak amplitude were reported compared to the young group. Correspondence of behavioral thresholds with GIN-ABR has also been mentioned in studies. Conclusion: The GIN-ABR method has been extensively utilized in investigating various factors, including age-related effects, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Notably, GIN-ABR has several clinical advantages, such as cost-effectiveness, shorter test duration, independence from alertness levels, attention, sleep depth fluctuations, or medication. Additionally, it has shown its compatibility with psychophysical tests. Further research is warranted to explore the impact of various factors on different components of GIN-ABR. Consequently, with its promising findings and growing body of research, the gap in noise test has the potential to be gradually integrated into the set of audiological clinical evaluations.","PeriodicalId":330157,"journal":{"name":"Function and Disability Journal","volume":"52 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Function and Disability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/fdj.6.262.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The gap in noise auditory brainstem responses (GIN-ABR) is a valuable assessment tool for auditory temporal processing, offering non-invasive and objective measurements encompassing the entire auditory system from the cochlea to the brainstem. This method has been utilized in investigating various factors, including age-related effects, hearing loss, and tinnitus. This systematic review was conducted to present a thorough examination of (GIN-ABR), encompassing its methodology, applications, and inherent limitations. Methods: This study was conducted based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane, PubMed, and Ovid databases were used to extract English articles from 1990 to June 2023. The search terms used were “gap in noise auditory brainstem response”, “ABR gap detection”, “ABR gap duration”, “ABR gap threshold”, and “ABR temporal processing”. Articles were included if gap-evoked ABR was used, investigating the effect of any factor on the responses, and using any gapped stimulus type. Articles whose evoked potentials did not include ABR waves were excluded. The outcome of interest was gap-evoked ABR in different participant groups. Results: A total of 10 studies were deemed suitable for inclusion in the review. The articles were reviewed that including the study population, the methods, and the results. Despite the variability in the results of the studies, in the aged group, longer latency shifts and decreased peak amplitude were reported compared to the young group. Correspondence of behavioral thresholds with GIN-ABR has also been mentioned in studies. Conclusion: The GIN-ABR method has been extensively utilized in investigating various factors, including age-related effects, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Notably, GIN-ABR has several clinical advantages, such as cost-effectiveness, shorter test duration, independence from alertness levels, attention, sleep depth fluctuations, or medication. Additionally, it has shown its compatibility with psychophysical tests. Further research is warranted to explore the impact of various factors on different components of GIN-ABR. Consequently, with its promising findings and growing body of research, the gap in noise test has the potential to be gradually integrated into the set of audiological clinical evaluations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
噪声听觉脑干反应中的间隙:系统回顾
背景和目的:噪声间隙听觉脑干反应(GIN-ABR)是一种评估听觉时间处理的重要工具,可对从耳蜗到脑干的整个听觉系统进行无创、客观的测量。这种方法已被用于调查各种因素,包括与年龄有关的影响、听力损失和耳鸣。本系统综述旨在对(GIN-ABR)进行全面研究,包括其方法、应用和固有的局限性。研究方法本研究根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。使用 Cochrane、PubMed 和 Ovid 数据库提取 1990 年至 2023 年 6 月期间的英文文章。使用的检索词包括 "噪声听性脑干反应中的间隙"、"ABR 间隙检测"、"ABR 间隙持续时间"、"ABR 间隙阈值 "和 "ABR 时间处理"。如果文章使用了间隙诱发的 ABR,调查了任何因素对反应的影响,并使用了任何间隙刺激类型,则会被收录。诱发电位不包括 ABR 波的文章被排除在外。感兴趣的结果是不同参与者群体的间隙诱发 ABR。结果:共有 10 项研究被认为适合纳入综述。综述文章包括研究人群、方法和结果。尽管研究结果存在差异,但与年轻组相比,老年组的潜伏期移位更长,峰值振幅降低。研究还提到了行为阈值与 GIN-ABR 的对应关系。结论GIN-ABR 方法已被广泛用于调查各种因素,包括与年龄有关的影响、听力损失和耳鸣。值得注意的是,GIN-ABR 具有一些临床优势,如成本效益高、测试时间短、不受警觉水平、注意力、睡眠深度波动或药物的影响。此外,它还显示出与心理物理测试的兼容性。还需要进一步研究各种因素对 GIN-ABR 不同组成部分的影响。因此,噪声间隙测试具有广阔的发展前景和不断增长的研究成果,有望逐步纳入听力学临床评估的范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perception and Experiences of Rehabilitation Service Providers of Teamwork Barriers in Tehran Province, Iran The Relationship Between Balance and Fine Motor Skills in Children With Intellectual Disability Gap in Noise Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Systematic Review The Effect of Vocal Warm up and Cool Down Exercises on the Acoustic Characteristics in Speech and Language Pathologists: A Pilot Study Application of the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) in Psychosocial Needs of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1