Ensuring the right to protection at the stage of appeal proceedings in criminal case: problems of theory and practice

O. Kachalova, S. A. Vdovin
{"title":"Ensuring the right to protection at the stage of appeal proceedings in criminal case: problems of theory and practice","authors":"O. Kachalova, S. A. Vdovin","doi":"10.18287/1810-4088-2020-15-2-7-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The right of the accused to a defense in criminal proceedings is a prerequisite for the effective administration of justice, since it minimizes possible errors in the final decision in a case, which may result in the conviction of innocent persons, which contradicts the purpose of criminal proceedings and undermines citizens confidence in the judicial system. \nThe purpose of the article is to identify systemic problems that impede the effective implementation of the right to defense at the stage of appeal, as well as to suggest ways to resolve them. \n \n \n \n \nMain results. The authors come to the conclusion that the structural and logical elements of ensuring the right of the accused to a defense at the stage of appeal proceedings in a criminal case are: subjects defending the accused; duties of a defense lawyer to exercise the right of the accused to defense at the stage of appeal proceedings in the case; subjects who, in accordance with the requirements of the criminal procedure law, are obliged to ensure the right of the accused to defense; the duties of the courts of first and appellate instances imposed on them by the criminal procedure law, corresponding to the rights of the accused, his defense lawyer and legal representative and forming in their totality a system of interim measures necessary for the realization of the accuseds right to defense; the powers of the accused, his defense counsel and legal representative, through which the constitutional right to defense is exercised; guarantees of the accuseds right to defense. The only ground for limiting the right to defense is abuse of the right by the defense. The fact of abuse of the right can only be established by the court, the abuse of the right cannot be evidenced exclusively by the external expression of the actions of participants in the process. The question of the presence or absence of abuse of the right to defense should be decided by the court on the basis of the totality of factual circumstances and procedural features of each individual situation. The system of powers that make up the content of the defendants right to defense at the stage of appeal proceedings in the case consists of two interrelated elements, including powers exercised at the stage of filing an appeal and before the start of the court session of the court of appeal, as well as the powers that the defense side has directly in consideration of a criminal case in a court session of the court of appeal. \n \n \n \n \nConclusion. Thus, the effective provision of the right to defense at the stage of appeal proceedings requires a change in approaches on the part of legislator and law enforcement officers.","PeriodicalId":329485,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Analytical Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Analytical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/1810-4088-2020-15-2-7-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The right of the accused to a defense in criminal proceedings is a prerequisite for the effective administration of justice, since it minimizes possible errors in the final decision in a case, which may result in the conviction of innocent persons, which contradicts the purpose of criminal proceedings and undermines citizens confidence in the judicial system. The purpose of the article is to identify systemic problems that impede the effective implementation of the right to defense at the stage of appeal, as well as to suggest ways to resolve them. Main results. The authors come to the conclusion that the structural and logical elements of ensuring the right of the accused to a defense at the stage of appeal proceedings in a criminal case are: subjects defending the accused; duties of a defense lawyer to exercise the right of the accused to defense at the stage of appeal proceedings in the case; subjects who, in accordance with the requirements of the criminal procedure law, are obliged to ensure the right of the accused to defense; the duties of the courts of first and appellate instances imposed on them by the criminal procedure law, corresponding to the rights of the accused, his defense lawyer and legal representative and forming in their totality a system of interim measures necessary for the realization of the accuseds right to defense; the powers of the accused, his defense counsel and legal representative, through which the constitutional right to defense is exercised; guarantees of the accuseds right to defense. The only ground for limiting the right to defense is abuse of the right by the defense. The fact of abuse of the right can only be established by the court, the abuse of the right cannot be evidenced exclusively by the external expression of the actions of participants in the process. The question of the presence or absence of abuse of the right to defense should be decided by the court on the basis of the totality of factual circumstances and procedural features of each individual situation. The system of powers that make up the content of the defendants right to defense at the stage of appeal proceedings in the case consists of two interrelated elements, including powers exercised at the stage of filing an appeal and before the start of the court session of the court of appeal, as well as the powers that the defense side has directly in consideration of a criminal case in a court session of the court of appeal. Conclusion. Thus, the effective provision of the right to defense at the stage of appeal proceedings requires a change in approaches on the part of legislator and law enforcement officers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刑事案件申诉阶段的保护权保障:理论与实践问题
介绍。被告在刑事诉讼中获得辩护的权利是有效司法的先决条件,因为它可以最大限度地减少在案件的最后决定中可能出现的错误,因为错误可能导致无辜的人被定罪,这与刑事诉讼的目的相矛盾,并破坏公民对司法制度的信心。本文的目的是找出妨碍申诉阶段有效行使辩护权的体制性问题,并提出解决这些问题的途径。主要的结果。笔者认为,保障刑事案件上诉阶段被告人辩护权的结构和逻辑要素是:被告人辩护人;辩护律师在案件上诉阶段行使被告人辩护权的义务;依照刑事诉讼法的规定,有义务保障被告人辩护权的主体;刑事诉讼法规定的一审法院和上诉法院的职责,与被告人、被告人的辩护律师和法定代理人的权利相对应,共同形成了实现被告人辩护权所必需的临时措施体系;被告人及其辩护律师、法定代理人行使宪法规定的辩护权的权力;被告人辩护权的保障。限制辩护权的唯一理由是辩护人滥用辩护权。权利被滥用的事实只能由法院认定,权利被滥用不能完全通过过程中参与者行为的外在表现来证明。是否存在滥用辩护权的问题,应由法院根据每一个别情况的全部事实情况和程序特点来决定。构成案件上诉阶段被告辩护权内容的权力体系,由两个相互关联的要素构成,一是在上诉法院提起上诉阶段及开庭前行使的权力,二是在上诉法院开庭审理刑事案件时,辩护方直接行使的权力。结论。因此,要在上诉程序阶段有效地规定辩护权,就需要立法者和执法人员改变做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personalized accounting in the pension system of the Russian Federation European Social Charter: basic guarantees of social and labor rights On the question of the relationship between entrepreneurial and professional activity The problem of the parties’ explanations as evidence in arbitration courts ABOUT THE RATIO OF ELEMENTS OF CRIMES PROVIDED FOR BY ARTICLES 201 AND 285 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1