On the question of the relationship between entrepreneurial and professional activity

E. Balashova
{"title":"On the question of the relationship between entrepreneurial and professional activity","authors":"E. Balashova","doi":"10.18287/1810-4088-2021-16-1-59-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the issues of qualification of various types of economic activity. An attempt is made to analyze the ratio of entrepreneurial and professional activities, and the criteria of professional activity are highlighted. The author comes to the conclusion that there is an interpretation of the concept of professional activity in the broad and narrow sense of the word. The author shares the conclusion that professional activity is carried out by an individual who has special knowledge, qualifications obtained either in the course of training, or formed as a result of gaining experience in the professional field. This person can carry out their professional duties, both within the framework of an employment contract, and independently under a civil law contract, engaging in private practice. Professional activity may or may not be entrepreneurial in nature. At the same time, entrepreneurial activity may not be professional in terms of the availability of special knowledge and qualifications. Legal regulation of both professional and business activities can be carried out by various methods, including using elements of self-regulation and without them, which does not allow its features to be used to distinguish between these types of activities. The article also considers the features of the concept of entrepreneurial activity, distinguishing this type of activity from other economic activities.","PeriodicalId":329485,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Analytical Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Analytical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/1810-4088-2021-16-1-59-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the issues of qualification of various types of economic activity. An attempt is made to analyze the ratio of entrepreneurial and professional activities, and the criteria of professional activity are highlighted. The author comes to the conclusion that there is an interpretation of the concept of professional activity in the broad and narrow sense of the word. The author shares the conclusion that professional activity is carried out by an individual who has special knowledge, qualifications obtained either in the course of training, or formed as a result of gaining experience in the professional field. This person can carry out their professional duties, both within the framework of an employment contract, and independently under a civil law contract, engaging in private practice. Professional activity may or may not be entrepreneurial in nature. At the same time, entrepreneurial activity may not be professional in terms of the availability of special knowledge and qualifications. Legal regulation of both professional and business activities can be carried out by various methods, including using elements of self-regulation and without them, which does not allow its features to be used to distinguish between these types of activities. The article also considers the features of the concept of entrepreneurial activity, distinguishing this type of activity from other economic activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论创业活动与专业活动的关系问题
本文论述了各类经济活动的资格问题。尝试分析创业活动和专业活动的比例,并强调了专业活动的标准。本文认为,对专业活动的概念有广义和狭义的解释。作者同意这样的结论,即专业活动是由具有特殊知识、在培训过程中获得的资格或在专业领域获得经验而形成的资格的个人进行的。这个人既可以在雇佣合同的框架内履行其专业职责,也可以独立地在民法合同下从事私人执业。专业活动可能具有也可能不具有创业性质。同时,企业活动在获得专门知识和资格方面可能不是专业的。对专业活动和商业活动的法律监管可以通过各种方法进行,包括使用和不使用自我监管的要素,这就不允许使用其特征来区分这些类型的活动。本文还考虑了创业活动概念的特征,将这种活动与其他经济活动区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personalized accounting in the pension system of the Russian Federation European Social Charter: basic guarantees of social and labor rights On the question of the relationship between entrepreneurial and professional activity The problem of the parties’ explanations as evidence in arbitration courts ABOUT THE RATIO OF ELEMENTS OF CRIMES PROVIDED FOR BY ARTICLES 201 AND 285 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1