{"title":"Quand le diable écrit et publie. Le littéraire comme pratique sociale dans la correspondance de Surin et La Possession de Loudun","authors":"Nicolas Schapira","doi":"10.4000/DOSSIERSGRIHL.6902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the devil writes and publishes. Literary practices as social practices in the Correspondence of Surin and the Possession of Lundun. This article analyses how Michel de Certeau uses literature as a social phenomenon on the one hand, and studies on literature on the other hand, to make room for the otherness of the past and to tackle this past without confining it in any historiography. First of all, we analyse how Certeau mobilizes the notion of \"literary genre\", that is to say how he uses an important tool of literary studies, though diverting it completely (in his edition of the Correspondence of Jean-Joseph Surin, a mystique, as well as in L'Ecriture de l' histoire). In this paper, we also enquire into the place of the literary phenomenon in Certeau's analysis of Loudun's possession. At the end of our study, it becomes possible to designate what would constitute for Certeau the main characteristic ‒ or one characteristic ‒ of literary practices.","PeriodicalId":266913,"journal":{"name":"Michel de Certeau et la littérature","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michel de Certeau et la littérature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/DOSSIERSGRIHL.6902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When the devil writes and publishes. Literary practices as social practices in the Correspondence of Surin and the Possession of Lundun. This article analyses how Michel de Certeau uses literature as a social phenomenon on the one hand, and studies on literature on the other hand, to make room for the otherness of the past and to tackle this past without confining it in any historiography. First of all, we analyse how Certeau mobilizes the notion of "literary genre", that is to say how he uses an important tool of literary studies, though diverting it completely (in his edition of the Correspondence of Jean-Joseph Surin, a mystique, as well as in L'Ecriture de l' histoire). In this paper, we also enquire into the place of the literary phenomenon in Certeau's analysis of Loudun's possession. At the end of our study, it becomes possible to designate what would constitute for Certeau the main characteristic ‒ or one characteristic ‒ of literary practices.
当魔鬼写作和出版时。《素林书信》与《伦敦占有》中的文学实践作为社会实践。本文分析了米歇尔·德·塞托如何一方面利用文学作为一种社会现象,另一方面利用文学研究,为过去的他性腾出空间,并在不局限于任何史学的情况下处理这个过去。首先,我们分析塞尔托如何调动“文学体裁”的概念,也就是说,他如何使用文学研究的一个重要工具,尽管完全转移了它(在他的《神秘的让-约瑟夫·苏林的通信》版本中,以及在《ecriture de L’histoire》中)。本文还探讨了这一文学现象在塞托对娄敦占有的分析中的地位。在我们研究的最后,我们有可能指出,对于塞托来说,文学实践的主要特征或一个特征是什么。