{"title":"Fabulous, Formless","authors":"Tavia Nyong’o","doi":"10.18574/NYU/9781479856275.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter enlists Gilles Deleuze’s theory of the “dark precursor”—the manner in which the past prefigures its future without determining or representing it—to give a different account of the role antinormativity plays in the past, present, and future of queer theory. By reading Samuel R. Delany’s early fictions as a pos-thumanist problematization of norms of race, gender, sexuality, and species being, and by understanding the problematic split between “afrofuturism” and “queer theory” in the 1990s, we regain a sense of how central blackness has been to the genesis of queer theorizing.","PeriodicalId":296157,"journal":{"name":"Afro-Fabulations","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afro-Fabulations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/NYU/9781479856275.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter enlists Gilles Deleuze’s theory of the “dark precursor”—the manner in which the past prefigures its future without determining or representing it—to give a different account of the role antinormativity plays in the past, present, and future of queer theory. By reading Samuel R. Delany’s early fictions as a pos-thumanist problematization of norms of race, gender, sexuality, and species being, and by understanding the problematic split between “afrofuturism” and “queer theory” in the 1990s, we regain a sense of how central blackness has been to the genesis of queer theorizing.
本章引用吉尔·德勒兹的“黑暗前驱”理论——过去预示未来而不决定或代表它的方式——来对反信息性在酷儿理论的过去、现在和未来中所扮演的角色给出不同的解释。通过阅读塞缪尔·r·德拉尼(Samuel R. Delany)的早期小说,将其视为对种族、性别、性和物种存在规范的后人文主义问题化,并通过理解20世纪90年代“非洲未来主义”和“酷儿理论”之间有问题的分裂,我们重新认识到黑人在酷儿理论的起源中是如何发挥核心作用的。