Narradores-trapeiros, anarquivamento e fragmentação em romances de Benedicto Monteiro

Abílio Pacheco de Souza
{"title":"Narradores-trapeiros, anarquivamento e fragmentação em romances de Benedicto Monteiro","authors":"Abílio Pacheco de Souza","doi":"10.53943/elcv.0222_29-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The novels by Benedicto Monteiro Verde vagomundo (1972), O minosauro (1975) and A terceira margem (1983), written and published in the context of the Brazilian military dictatorship, employ in their compositions the technique of montage and fragmentation, common to other novels from the 1970’s (Franco, 1998), and they appear to us in their non-conforming feature as disjointed fractals and as self-moving trees (Pacheco, 2020). Mobilizing diverse discursive materials collected in society and inserting them in the novel, the narrator promotes a disorder in the logic of the Western, Cartesian, Enlightenment archive, he acts like a garbage collector, like the Baudelairean ragpicker, to put us in front of an anti-archive. He collects and presents the reader with a seemingly random collection of radio transcripts, newspaper and magazine news, songs lyrics, poems, technical reports, testimonials, and other discursive material. In this paper, we analyze the rag-picker narrator and the anarchivation, the anarchivation of the archive that shakes the edifice of Western reason, as the residues of society are collected from the ruins to critically reconstruct a discourse (according to Seligmann-Silva, 2014). Anarchivation, as a gesture of disorder and fragmentation, carried out by the narrators, appears as an aesthetic principle and corresponds to the perception of shock by the subject in the face of the rigging of the State and the vertigo caused by the violent, technocratic apparatus. After all, in the context in which the novels were written, the measure of good and evil and the subjugation of the subject's autonomy are under the rule of a State whose policy is based on violence and control (Todorov, 2008). Fragmentation and anarchivation as ways of disposing the narrative correspond to the way of perceiving himself, others and the world by this narrator, also disjointed, in a context and because of a violent, adverse, degrading context.","PeriodicalId":288631,"journal":{"name":"e-Letras com Vida: Revista de Estudos Globais — Humanidades, Ciências e Artes","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Letras com Vida: Revista de Estudos Globais — Humanidades, Ciências e Artes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53943/elcv.0222_29-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The novels by Benedicto Monteiro Verde vagomundo (1972), O minosauro (1975) and A terceira margem (1983), written and published in the context of the Brazilian military dictatorship, employ in their compositions the technique of montage and fragmentation, common to other novels from the 1970’s (Franco, 1998), and they appear to us in their non-conforming feature as disjointed fractals and as self-moving trees (Pacheco, 2020). Mobilizing diverse discursive materials collected in society and inserting them in the novel, the narrator promotes a disorder in the logic of the Western, Cartesian, Enlightenment archive, he acts like a garbage collector, like the Baudelairean ragpicker, to put us in front of an anti-archive. He collects and presents the reader with a seemingly random collection of radio transcripts, newspaper and magazine news, songs lyrics, poems, technical reports, testimonials, and other discursive material. In this paper, we analyze the rag-picker narrator and the anarchivation, the anarchivation of the archive that shakes the edifice of Western reason, as the residues of society are collected from the ruins to critically reconstruct a discourse (according to Seligmann-Silva, 2014). Anarchivation, as a gesture of disorder and fragmentation, carried out by the narrators, appears as an aesthetic principle and corresponds to the perception of shock by the subject in the face of the rigging of the State and the vertigo caused by the violent, technocratic apparatus. After all, in the context in which the novels were written, the measure of good and evil and the subjugation of the subject's autonomy are under the rule of a State whose policy is based on violence and control (Todorov, 2008). Fragmentation and anarchivation as ways of disposing the narrative correspond to the way of perceiving himself, others and the world by this narrator, also disjointed, in a context and because of a violent, adverse, degrading context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本尼迪克托·蒙泰罗小说中的叙述者、无政府主义和分裂
Benedicto Monteiro Verde vagomundo(1972年),O minosauro(1975年)和A terceira margem(1983年)的小说在巴西军事独裁的背景下写作和出版,在他们的作品中使用蒙太奇和碎片化的技术,这是20世纪70年代其他小说所常见的(Franco, 1998年),他们在我们看来,他们的不一致特征是脱节的分形和自我移动的树木(Pacheco, 2020年)。调动社会中收集的各种话语材料并将它们插入小说中,叙述者促进了西方笛卡尔式启蒙运动档案逻辑的混乱,他像一个垃圾收集者,像波德莱尔式的拾荒者,把我们带到一个反档案面前。他收集并呈现给读者的似乎是随机收集的广播记录、报纸和杂志新闻、歌曲歌词、诗歌、技术报告、感言和其他话语材料。在本文中,我们分析了拾荒者叙述者和无政府化,即动摇西方理性大厦的档案的无政府化,因为从废墟中收集社会残留物以批判性地重建话语(根据Seligmann-Silva, 2014)。无政府主义,作为一种无序和分裂的姿态,由叙述者执行,作为一种美学原则出现,并与主体面对国家的操纵和暴力技术官僚机器造成的眩晕的震惊感知相对应。毕竟,在小说创作的背景下,善与恶的衡量和主体自治的征服都是在一个以暴力和控制为政策基础的国家的统治下进行的(托多罗夫,2008)。碎片化和无政府化作为处理叙事的方式对应于叙述者感知自己,他人和世界的方式,同样是脱节的,在一个暴力的,不利的,有辱人格的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Os riscos de bordado — Caminhos da prosa romântica brasileira Zaíta não será esquecida: a vida em fragmentos e as crianças em Conceição Evaristo Narradores-trapeiros, anarquivamento e fragmentação em romances de Benedicto Monteiro Repressão e violência do Estado no romance O corpo interminável, de Cláudia Lage Apresentação - Dossiê Temático
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1