Blended Learning Integrated with Project-Based Learning: Its Effect on Learning Outcomes, Perception, and Self-Regulated Learning

L. Pohan, Julia Maulina
{"title":"Blended Learning Integrated with Project-Based Learning: Its Effect on Learning Outcomes, Perception, and Self-Regulated Learning","authors":"L. Pohan, Julia Maulina","doi":"10.23887/jpki.v6i2.48213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demands on chemistry learning require hands-on action in the form of practicums to fit understanding of chemical concepts, examine the theories obtained and relate them to everyday scientific phenomena through scientific activities in the laboratory. So that cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning outcomes are achieved. This research is a type of qualitative descriptive research. This study investigates student perceptions and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) on integrated blended learning Project Based Learning that affects student learning outcomes. The research subjects were nine people students who were enrolled in basic chemistry courses. This research was conducted for seven meetings where the learning process was carried out with a mixture of online and offline lectures called Blended Learning. Data collection was conducted through interviews to determine student perceptions of Blended Learning and a questionnaire to determine the student's SRL level. Learning Outcomes (LO) tests were in the form of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The interview data were analyzed inductively. Meanwhile, the SRL data analysis and the LO test are presented as an integrated and comparative description. Students' interviews revealed positive perceptions about the learning. This study found that the students' SRL were in the high (56%), medium (33%), and low (11%) categories. The LO assessment was obtained from the pre-test and post-test; all students' scores increased. As for the attitude, the measurements showed four categories: very good (67%), good (11%), adequate (11%), and poor (11%). Assessment of instruments designed showed that 67% of the instruments were developed while another 33% were underdeveloped.","PeriodicalId":296575,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v6i2.48213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The demands on chemistry learning require hands-on action in the form of practicums to fit understanding of chemical concepts, examine the theories obtained and relate them to everyday scientific phenomena through scientific activities in the laboratory. So that cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning outcomes are achieved. This research is a type of qualitative descriptive research. This study investigates student perceptions and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) on integrated blended learning Project Based Learning that affects student learning outcomes. The research subjects were nine people students who were enrolled in basic chemistry courses. This research was conducted for seven meetings where the learning process was carried out with a mixture of online and offline lectures called Blended Learning. Data collection was conducted through interviews to determine student perceptions of Blended Learning and a questionnaire to determine the student's SRL level. Learning Outcomes (LO) tests were in the form of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The interview data were analyzed inductively. Meanwhile, the SRL data analysis and the LO test are presented as an integrated and comparative description. Students' interviews revealed positive perceptions about the learning. This study found that the students' SRL were in the high (56%), medium (33%), and low (11%) categories. The LO assessment was obtained from the pre-test and post-test; all students' scores increased. As for the attitude, the measurements showed four categories: very good (67%), good (11%), adequate (11%), and poor (11%). Assessment of instruments designed showed that 67% of the instruments were developed while another 33% were underdeveloped.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合学习与基于项目的学习相结合:对学习成果、认知和自我调节学习的影响
对化学学习的要求要求学生以实习的形式动手实践,以适应对化学概念的理解,检验所获得的理论,并通过实验室中的科学活动将其与日常科学现象联系起来。从而达到认知、情感和精神运动的学习效果。本研究属于定性描述性研究。本研究旨在探讨学生对综合混合式学习的认知和自我调节学习(SRL)对学生学习成果的影响。研究对象为9名参加基础化学课程的学生。这项研究是在七次会议上进行的,在这些会议上,学习过程是通过称为混合学习的在线和离线讲座混合进行的。数据收集是通过访谈来确定学生对混合式学习的看法,并通过问卷来确定学生的SRL水平。学习结果(LO)测试以认知、情感和精神运动的形式进行。对访谈资料进行归纳分析。同时,对SRL数据分析和LO检验进行了综合比较描述。学生的访谈显示了对学习的积极看法。本研究发现学生的SRL分为高(56%)、中(33%)和低(11%)三类。LO评价由前测和后测得出;所有学生的分数都提高了。在态度方面,调查结果分为“非常好”(67%)、“好”(11%)、“尚可”(11%)、“差”(11%)等4个等级。对设计仪器的评估表明,67%的仪器已开发,另有33%的仪器不发达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guided Inquiry-Based Basic Chemistry Practicum Guidelines and Its Impact on Students' Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking Skills Application of Student Worksheets Based on Hyperdocs in Chemistry Learning on Scientific Creativity Using the Reaction Rate Learning Module with a STEM Approach to Student’s Creative Thinking Ability The TPACK Profile of Chemistry Prospective Teachers in Microteaching Class, University of Bengkulu The Validity and Practicality of the SETS-Based (Science, Environment, Technology, and Society) Interactive E-Book of Thermochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1