{"title":"Using program and user information to improve file prediction performance","authors":"Tsozen Yeh, D. Long, S. Brandt","doi":"10.1109/ISPASS.2001.990685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correct prediction of file accesses can improve system pe formance by mitigating the relative speed difference between CPU and disks. This paper discusses Program-based Last Successor (PLS) and presents Program- and Userbased Lust Successor (PULS), file prediction algorithms that utilize information about the program and user that access the jles. Our simulation results show that PLS makes 21% fewer incorrect predictions and PULS makes 24% fewer incorrect predictions than last-successor with roughly the same number of correct predictions that lastsuccessor makes. The cache space wasted on incorrectpredictions can be reduced accordingly. We also show that a cache using the Least Recently Used (LRU) caching algorithm can perform better when the PULS is applied. In some cases, a cache using LRU and either PLS or PULS performs better than a cache up to 40 times larger using LRU alone.","PeriodicalId":104148,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software. ISPASS.","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software. ISPASS.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2001.990685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
Correct prediction of file accesses can improve system pe formance by mitigating the relative speed difference between CPU and disks. This paper discusses Program-based Last Successor (PLS) and presents Program- and Userbased Lust Successor (PULS), file prediction algorithms that utilize information about the program and user that access the jles. Our simulation results show that PLS makes 21% fewer incorrect predictions and PULS makes 24% fewer incorrect predictions than last-successor with roughly the same number of correct predictions that lastsuccessor makes. The cache space wasted on incorrectpredictions can be reduced accordingly. We also show that a cache using the Least Recently Used (LRU) caching algorithm can perform better when the PULS is applied. In some cases, a cache using LRU and either PLS or PULS performs better than a cache up to 40 times larger using LRU alone.