{"title":"The Future of Philosophy","authors":"S. Gabriel","doi":"10.23925/2764-0892.2022.v2.n1.e62112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past, philosophy, as it was brought to life originally by the ancient Greeks, was based on the audacious premise that the cosmos is intelligible, that human reason can come to understand reality at least in part.  In the early to mid-twentieth century, however, philosophy was declared dead on both sides of the analytic-continental divide, so it seems appropriate to ask whether philosophy has a future and, if so, what sort of future this could and should be.  In this essay, I first look at the claims of philosophy’s demise and their philosophical milieu, focusing on Martin Heidegger, Bertrand Russell, and Ludwig Wittgenstein.  Then I suggest a reason for the dire forecast, namely, the aftermath of what has been called the “Second Thirty Years’ War,” and respond to objections that can be raised against this explanation.  Finally, I indicate the sort of future that I think we should envision for philosophy.","PeriodicalId":105071,"journal":{"name":"Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23925/2764-0892.2022.v2.n1.e62112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past, philosophy, as it was brought to life originally by the ancient Greeks, was based on the audacious premise that the cosmos is intelligible, that human reason can come to understand reality at least in part.  In the early to mid-twentieth century, however, philosophy was declared dead on both sides of the analytic-continental divide, so it seems appropriate to ask whether philosophy has a future and, if so, what sort of future this could and should be.  In this essay, I first look at the claims of philosophy’s demise and their philosophical milieu, focusing on Martin Heidegger, Bertrand Russell, and Ludwig Wittgenstein.  Then I suggest a reason for the dire forecast, namely, the aftermath of what has been called the “Second Thirty Years’ War,” and respond to objections that can be raised against this explanation.  Finally, I indicate the sort of future that I think we should envision for philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哲学的未来
在过去,哲学最初是由古希腊人赋予生命的,它是建立在一个大胆的前提之上的,即宇宙是可以理解的,人类的理性至少可以部分地理解现实。然而,在20世纪早期到中期,哲学在分析与大陆分裂的双方都被宣布死亡,因此,哲学是否有未来,如果有,这种未来可能是什么样的,应该是什么样的,似乎是合适的问题。在这篇文章中,我首先看看哲学灭亡的主张及其哲学环境,重点是马丁·海德格尔,伯特兰·罗素和路德维希·维特根斯坦。然后,我提出了这种可怕预测的一个原因,即所谓的“第二次三十年战争”的后果,并回应了可能对这种解释提出的反对意见。最后,我指出了我认为我们应该为哲学设想的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Future of Philosophy The reflexive ceiling of philosophical semantics: struggle for Existence and the Ideal Review - GABRIEL, Gottfried. Kant: Eine kurze Einführung in das Gesamtwerk. Paderborn: Brill Schöningh, 2022. 144 p. Review - RICKERT, Heinrich: Los Dos Caminos De La Teoría Del Conocimiento Y Otros Ensayos. Edición De Stefano Cazzanelli Y Miguel Martí Sánchez. Editorial Comares: Granada, 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1