The Effect of Text Difficulty on Types of Miscues among Proficient, Average and Below Average Readers

Van Gramberg, Dilhara Vithanage
{"title":"The Effect of Text Difficulty on Types of Miscues among Proficient, Average and Below Average Readers","authors":"Van Gramberg, Dilhara Vithanage","doi":"10.54389/utmq5181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to understand the differences in the type of miscues among proficient, average and below average readers as text difficulty increases. It was hypothesised that the percentage of semantic and syntactic cues made by proficient in comparison to average and below average readers will increase as the text difficulty increases. The lack of available literature with regard to reading errors facilitated the designing of this study which could serve as a base to design remedial instruction and intervention tools. A quasi-experimental design was used to investigate this relationship. A sample of hundred and three students (N=103) were recorded while reading four levels of passages with increasing difficulty and miscues were analysed according to the three cueing system. The first level passage was a tested grade appropriate passage which was used to determine if the reader was proficient, average or below average based on their accuracy scores. Results revealed that there was no significant difference across the three cueing system and reading ability. However, it was observed that readers rely on the grapho phonics cueing system when encountered with a difficult word. The findings of this study can be used to design reading instruction and remedial systems. Keywords: Miscue; Grapho-phonics; Semantics; Syntactic","PeriodicalId":112882,"journal":{"name":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE SLIIT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCEMENTS IN SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES [SICASH]","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE SLIIT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCEMENTS IN SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES [SICASH]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54389/utmq5181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to understand the differences in the type of miscues among proficient, average and below average readers as text difficulty increases. It was hypothesised that the percentage of semantic and syntactic cues made by proficient in comparison to average and below average readers will increase as the text difficulty increases. The lack of available literature with regard to reading errors facilitated the designing of this study which could serve as a base to design remedial instruction and intervention tools. A quasi-experimental design was used to investigate this relationship. A sample of hundred and three students (N=103) were recorded while reading four levels of passages with increasing difficulty and miscues were analysed according to the three cueing system. The first level passage was a tested grade appropriate passage which was used to determine if the reader was proficient, average or below average based on their accuracy scores. Results revealed that there was no significant difference across the three cueing system and reading ability. However, it was observed that readers rely on the grapho phonics cueing system when encountered with a difficult word. The findings of this study can be used to design reading instruction and remedial systems. Keywords: Miscue; Grapho-phonics; Semantics; Syntactic
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文本难度对熟练、一般和低于一般阅读者误解类型的影响
本研究的目的是了解随着文本难度的增加,熟练读者、普通读者和低于普通读者的误解类型的差异。据推测,与平均水平和低于平均水平的读者相比,熟练读者所获得的语义和句法线索的百分比会随着文本难度的增加而增加。由于缺乏有关阅读错误的文献,本研究的设计可作为设计补救指导和干预工具的基础。采用准实验设计来研究这种关系。以103名学生为样本,记录了他们在阅读难度逐渐增加的四个等级的文章时的情况,并根据三线索系统分析了错误。第一级的文章是一个测试等级适当的文章,用来确定读者是熟练,平均或低于平均水平的基础上,他们的准确性得分。结果显示,三种线索系统与阅读能力之间没有显著差异。然而,我们观察到,当读者遇到一个困难的单词时,他们依赖于图形语音提示系统。本研究结果可用于设计阅读教学和补救系统。关键词:失误;Grapho-phonics;语义;语法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analytical Study of the Factors Influencing the English Speaking Proficiency of Prospective English Medium Teachers Convergence of Gradient Methods with Deterministic and Bounded Noise Satisfaction Level and Quality of Life of patients Living with Split-Thickness Skin Graft, Following a Burn Injury in Burns Unit of the National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka The Effect of Text Difficulty on Types of Miscues among Proficient, Average and Below Average Readers Perceptions of People with Mental Disorders about Their Mental Health Condition; An Exploratory Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1