Practitioner Criticism: Painting

J. Wallace
{"title":"Practitioner Criticism: Painting","authors":"J. Wallace","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474456623.003.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines D. H. Lawrence’s writings on visual art in the context of his own practice as a painter. It explores a relationship between the concepts of painting and picture-making in two sections. Part I, ‘Early Painterly Criticism’, argues that Lawrence’s development as an authoritative art critic is shaped by his intense consciousness of the class boundaries that determine access to artworks and art education. ‘Later Painterly Criticism’ then examines writing from 1925 onwards which took Paul Cézanne as the model of a de-aestheticised art, leading to the use of the non-technical term ‘life’ to assess his own paintings, when this original painterly work began in 1926 and was exhibited in 1929. The chapter concludes that Lawrence’s visual aesthetic was always entwined with the question of material access to art and its discourses in a class-based society, and thus that Lawrence was simultaneously committed to ideas of individual painterly genius and to wider democratic inclusivity in the field of visual culture.","PeriodicalId":198046,"journal":{"name":"The Edinburgh Companion to D. H. Lawrence and the Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Edinburgh Companion to D. H. Lawrence and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474456623.003.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines D. H. Lawrence’s writings on visual art in the context of his own practice as a painter. It explores a relationship between the concepts of painting and picture-making in two sections. Part I, ‘Early Painterly Criticism’, argues that Lawrence’s development as an authoritative art critic is shaped by his intense consciousness of the class boundaries that determine access to artworks and art education. ‘Later Painterly Criticism’ then examines writing from 1925 onwards which took Paul Cézanne as the model of a de-aestheticised art, leading to the use of the non-technical term ‘life’ to assess his own paintings, when this original painterly work began in 1926 and was exhibited in 1929. The chapter concludes that Lawrence’s visual aesthetic was always entwined with the question of material access to art and its discourses in a class-based society, and thus that Lawrence was simultaneously committed to ideas of individual painterly genius and to wider democratic inclusivity in the field of visual culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实践者批评:绘画
本章考察d.h.劳伦斯在他自己作为画家的实践背景下关于视觉艺术的著作。它将分两个部分探讨绘画概念和绘画制作之间的关系。第一部分,“早期绘画批评”,认为劳伦斯作为权威艺术评论家的发展是由他对阶级界限的强烈意识所塑造的,阶级界限决定了艺术品和艺术教育的获取。“后来的绘画批评”随后审查了从1925年开始的作品,这些作品将保罗·csamzanne作为去审美艺术的典范,导致使用非技术术语“生活”来评估他自己的绘画,当这幅原始的绘画作品开始于1926年,并于1929年展出。这一章的结论是,劳伦斯的视觉美学总是与以阶级为基础的社会中物质获取艺术及其话语的问题交织在一起,因此劳伦斯同时致力于个人绘画天才的思想和视觉文化领域更广泛的民主包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clothing and Jewellery Historiography and Life Writing Practitioner Criticism: Painting Drama and the Dramatic Practitioner Criticism: Poetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1