Terrorism and the Varieties of Civil Liberties

Michael A. Rubin, Richard K. Morgan
{"title":"Terrorism and the Varieties of Civil Liberties","authors":"Michael A. Rubin, Richard K. Morgan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3361330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How do government protections, and violations, of its citizens’ civil liberties influence the country's exposure to terrorism? Existing research remains divided. We contribute clarity to these debates by examining the distinct effects of specific types of civil liberties: physical integrity (e.g., freedom from extra-judicial torture and killing), political liberties (e.g., freedom of expression and assembly), and private liberties (e.g., freedom of thought and religion and property rights). We distinguish these civil liberties dimensions from the role of institutions for political selection (e.g., elections) and horizontal accountability (e.g., checks and balances, executive constraints). We argue physical integrity rights decrease terrorism, by reducing grievances against and increasing trust in the state, while political liberties increase terrorism, by both incentivizing violence among those with extremist goals and protecting their ability to organize. Empirically, we measure a country's exposure to terrorism using the Global Terrorism Database. We isolate the effects of government actions on these civil liberties dimensions from each other, and from the effects of the state's political institutions, by leveraging the Varieties of Democracy data. Our sample covers 177 states from 1970 to 2018. We find evidence consistent with our hypotheses regarding the effects of the distinct component dimensions of civil liberties.","PeriodicalId":273343,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Combating Terrorism (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Combating Terrorism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3361330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

How do government protections, and violations, of its citizens’ civil liberties influence the country's exposure to terrorism? Existing research remains divided. We contribute clarity to these debates by examining the distinct effects of specific types of civil liberties: physical integrity (e.g., freedom from extra-judicial torture and killing), political liberties (e.g., freedom of expression and assembly), and private liberties (e.g., freedom of thought and religion and property rights). We distinguish these civil liberties dimensions from the role of institutions for political selection (e.g., elections) and horizontal accountability (e.g., checks and balances, executive constraints). We argue physical integrity rights decrease terrorism, by reducing grievances against and increasing trust in the state, while political liberties increase terrorism, by both incentivizing violence among those with extremist goals and protecting their ability to organize. Empirically, we measure a country's exposure to terrorism using the Global Terrorism Database. We isolate the effects of government actions on these civil liberties dimensions from each other, and from the effects of the state's political institutions, by leveraging the Varieties of Democracy data. Our sample covers 177 states from 1970 to 2018. We find evidence consistent with our hypotheses regarding the effects of the distinct component dimensions of civil liberties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恐怖主义和公民自由的多样性
政府对公民公民自由的保护和侵犯如何影响这个国家对恐怖主义的暴露?现有的研究仍存在分歧。我们通过研究特定类型的公民自由的不同影响来澄清这些争论:身体完整(例如,免于法外酷刑和杀戮的自由),政治自由(例如,言论和集会的自由)和私人自由(例如,思想、宗教和财产权的自由)。我们将这些公民自由维度与政治选择(如选举)和横向问责制(如制衡、行政约束)制度的作用区分开来。我们认为人身安全权利通过减少对国家的不满和增加对国家的信任来减少恐怖主义,而政治自由通过激励具有极端主义目标的人的暴力和保护他们的组织能力来增加恐怖主义。根据经验,我们使用全球恐怖主义数据库来衡量一个国家遭受恐怖主义的程度。我们通过利用民主多样性数据,将政府行为对这些公民自由维度的影响,以及国家政治机构的影响,相互隔离开来。我们的样本涵盖了1970年至2018年的177个州。我们发现证据与我们关于公民自由的不同组成维度的影响的假设一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laws and Measures Preventing Terrorism in the UK: A Necessary Evil? Terrorism and the Varieties of Civil Liberties Honor Among Thieves: Understanding Rhetorical and Material Cooperation Among Militant Groups Narcissism Over Ideology: Revealed versus Stated Terrorist Preferences Sovereign Development: Outline of a Grand Strategy for Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1