The birth of Buddhist politics of religious freedom in Myanmar

I. Frydenlund
{"title":"The birth of Buddhist politics of religious freedom in Myanmar","authors":"I. Frydenlund","doi":"10.1080/20566093.2017.1390656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Given the long history of discrimination and violence against religious and ethnic minorities in Myanmar, international and transnational actors have engaged to address injustice and suffering. These ‘expert’ actors carry with them a particular understanding of religion and of religious freedom, often emphasizing the right to proselytize and to change one’s religion, or the right to freely associate in religious buildings. These actors engage in a Burmese landscape of domestic expert actors who might or might not share their concerns, creating a myriad of entanglements of ‘expert religion’ in the field of religious freedom, religious minority rights and interreligious relations. In the years 2013–2015 this diverse landscape came to be dominated by the Buddhist group MaBaTha and its campaign for four laws ‘to protect race and religion’ against the perceived ‘islamization’ of Myanmar. This article investigates ideas of religious freedom by looking at MaBaTha draft laws and the final 2015 legislation, considering how a ‘Buddhist politics of religious freedom’ became a tool to protect Buddhism from the perceived dangers posed by Islam.","PeriodicalId":252085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2017.1390656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Given the long history of discrimination and violence against religious and ethnic minorities in Myanmar, international and transnational actors have engaged to address injustice and suffering. These ‘expert’ actors carry with them a particular understanding of religion and of religious freedom, often emphasizing the right to proselytize and to change one’s religion, or the right to freely associate in religious buildings. These actors engage in a Burmese landscape of domestic expert actors who might or might not share their concerns, creating a myriad of entanglements of ‘expert religion’ in the field of religious freedom, religious minority rights and interreligious relations. In the years 2013–2015 this diverse landscape came to be dominated by the Buddhist group MaBaTha and its campaign for four laws ‘to protect race and religion’ against the perceived ‘islamization’ of Myanmar. This article investigates ideas of religious freedom by looking at MaBaTha draft laws and the final 2015 legislation, considering how a ‘Buddhist politics of religious freedom’ became a tool to protect Buddhism from the perceived dangers posed by Islam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缅甸宗教自由的佛教政治诞生
鉴于缅甸长期以来对宗教和少数民族的歧视和暴力,国际和跨国行为者一直致力于解决不公正和痛苦问题。这些“专家”行为者对宗教和宗教自由有着特殊的理解,通常强调改变宗教信仰和改变宗教信仰的权利,或者在宗教建筑中自由结社的权利。这些演员参与了缅甸国内专家演员的景观,他们可能会或可能不会分享他们的担忧,在宗教自由,宗教少数群体权利和宗教间关系领域创造了无数的“专家宗教”纠缠。在2013年至2015年期间,佛教团体MaBaTha主导了这一多元化的景观,并发起了四项法律的运动,以“保护种族和宗教”,反对缅甸的“伊斯兰化”。本文通过查看MaBaTha的法律草案和2015年的最终立法来研究宗教自由的概念,考虑“佛教宗教自由政治”如何成为保护佛教免受伊斯兰教所带来的危险的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
State use of public order and social cohesion concerns in the securitisation of non-mainstream Muslims in Malaysia Which Islam? Whose Shariah? Islamisation and citizen recognition in contemporary Indonesia Quest for justice: Islamism, social justice, and civility in Islamic history Speaking Islamic: self-actualisation and justice in Malaysia and India Islamisation in the Indonesian media spaces new sites for a conservative push
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1