{"title":"Why the schema theorem is correct also in the presence of stochastic effects","authors":"R. Poli","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2000.870336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J. Holland's (1975) schema theorem has been criticised by D.B. Fogel and A. Ghozeil (1997, 1998, 1999) for not being able to correctly estimate the expected proportion of a schema in the population when fitness-proportionate selection is used in the presence of noise or other stochastic effects. This is incorrect for two reasons. Firstly, the theorem in its original form is not applicable to this case. If the quantities involved in schema theorems are random variables, the theorems must be interpreted as conditional statements. Secondly, the conditional versions of Holland and other researchers' schema theorems are indeed very useful to model the sampling of schemata in the presence of stochasticity. In this paper, I show how one can calculate the correct expected proportion of a schema in the presence of stochastic effects when only selection is present, using a conditional interpretation of Holland's schema theorem. In addition, I generalise this result (again using schema theorems) to the case in which crossover, mutation and selection-with-replacement are used. This can be considered as an exact schema theorem that is applicable both in the presence and in the absence of stochastic effects.","PeriodicalId":218136,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512)","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2000.870336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Abstract
J. Holland's (1975) schema theorem has been criticised by D.B. Fogel and A. Ghozeil (1997, 1998, 1999) for not being able to correctly estimate the expected proportion of a schema in the population when fitness-proportionate selection is used in the presence of noise or other stochastic effects. This is incorrect for two reasons. Firstly, the theorem in its original form is not applicable to this case. If the quantities involved in schema theorems are random variables, the theorems must be interpreted as conditional statements. Secondly, the conditional versions of Holland and other researchers' schema theorems are indeed very useful to model the sampling of schemata in the presence of stochasticity. In this paper, I show how one can calculate the correct expected proportion of a schema in the presence of stochastic effects when only selection is present, using a conditional interpretation of Holland's schema theorem. In addition, I generalise this result (again using schema theorems) to the case in which crossover, mutation and selection-with-replacement are used. This can be considered as an exact schema theorem that is applicable both in the presence and in the absence of stochastic effects.
J. Holland(1975)的模式定理受到D.B. Fogel和a . Ghozeil(1997,1998,1999)的批评,因为当在存在噪声或其他随机效应的情况下使用适合度比例选择时,不能正确估计总体中模式的期望比例。这是不正确的,原因有二。首先,原始形式的定理不适用于这种情况。如果模式定理中涉及的量是随机变量,则必须将定理解释为条件语句。其次,Holland和其他研究者的图式定理的条件版本对于在存在随机性的情况下对图式抽样进行建模确实非常有用。在本文中,我展示了如何使用Holland模式定理的条件解释,在只有选择的情况下,在随机效应存在的情况下,计算模式的正确期望比例。此外,我将这个结果(再次使用模式定理)推广到使用交叉、突变和带替换的选择的情况。这可以被认为是一个精确的模式定理,在存在和不存在随机效应的情况下都适用。