Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies

Mohammad Nazim, R. Bhardwaj
{"title":"Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies","authors":"Mohammad Nazim, R. Bhardwaj","doi":"10.1108/dlp-06-2022-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to analyze open access (OA) scholarly publishing patterns as well as OA policies and mandates across European countries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study is based on a descriptive research approach using data from Web resources, directories and bibliographic and citation databases, namely, DOAJ, OpenDOAR, SCImago journal and Country Ranking portal, ROARMAP and Web of Science.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that the initiatives and measures in Europe that promote OA are adequate. OA journals and digital repositories have progressively increased over the past two decades. Of the total journals (n = 25,231) published worldwide and indexed in Scopus, 53% are published in European countries, with 23.7% being OA journals. In total, 34% of the OA repositories (n = 5,714) are in European countries. The proportion of OA journal papers has grown significantly in all European countries, with a 14.3% annual growth rate. The average proportion of OA publications in European countries is significantly higher (39.07%) than the world average (30.16%), with a clear inclination for making research literature openly accessible via the green OA route (79.41%) compared to the gold OA route (52.30%). Most European research funders and institutions have required researchers to make OA available for their research findings, either by publishing them in OA journals or depositing accepted manuscripts in repositories.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study analyzed OA trends in Europe; other continents and countries were not included in the analysis. The study only described OA policies and mandates; the extent to which the OA policies and mandates were implemented was not studied. However, the results of the study may be helpful to policymakers, funders, research institutions and universities in other countries in adopting and implementing OA policies and mandates.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, the study is the first that used multiple data sources for investigating different facets of OA publishing in European countries, including OA journals, digital repositories, research output, mandates and policies for publicly funded research. The findings will be helpful for researchers and policymakers interested in promoting OA adoption among researchers worldwide.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-06-2022-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to analyze open access (OA) scholarly publishing patterns as well as OA policies and mandates across European countries. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on a descriptive research approach using data from Web resources, directories and bibliographic and citation databases, namely, DOAJ, OpenDOAR, SCImago journal and Country Ranking portal, ROARMAP and Web of Science. Findings The findings indicate that the initiatives and measures in Europe that promote OA are adequate. OA journals and digital repositories have progressively increased over the past two decades. Of the total journals (n = 25,231) published worldwide and indexed in Scopus, 53% are published in European countries, with 23.7% being OA journals. In total, 34% of the OA repositories (n = 5,714) are in European countries. The proportion of OA journal papers has grown significantly in all European countries, with a 14.3% annual growth rate. The average proportion of OA publications in European countries is significantly higher (39.07%) than the world average (30.16%), with a clear inclination for making research literature openly accessible via the green OA route (79.41%) compared to the gold OA route (52.30%). Most European research funders and institutions have required researchers to make OA available for their research findings, either by publishing them in OA journals or depositing accepted manuscripts in repositories. Research limitations/implications The study analyzed OA trends in Europe; other continents and countries were not included in the analysis. The study only described OA policies and mandates; the extent to which the OA policies and mandates were implemented was not studied. However, the results of the study may be helpful to policymakers, funders, research institutions and universities in other countries in adopting and implementing OA policies and mandates. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the study is the first that used multiple data sources for investigating different facets of OA publishing in European countries, including OA journals, digital repositories, research output, mandates and policies for publicly funded research. The findings will be helpful for researchers and policymakers interested in promoting OA adoption among researchers worldwide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲国家的开放获取倡议:趋势和政策分析
本文旨在分析开放获取(OA)学术出版模式以及欧洲国家的OA政策和授权。设计/方法/方法本研究基于描述性研究方法,使用来自网络资源、目录、书目和引文数据库的数据,即DOAJ、OpenDOAR、SCImago期刊和国家排名门户网站、ROARMAP和Web of Science。研究结果研究结果表明,欧洲促进OA的举措和措施是充分的。开放获取期刊和数字资源库在过去二十年中逐步增加。在Scopus收录的全球出版期刊总数(n = 25231)中,53%出版于欧洲国家,其中23.7%为OA期刊。总的来说,34%的OA知识库(n = 5714)位于欧洲国家。在所有欧洲国家,OA期刊论文的比例都有显著增长,年增长率为14.3%。欧洲国家开放获取出版物的平均比例(39.07%)明显高于世界平均水平(30.16%),研究文献开放获取的绿色开放获取路径(79.41%)明显高于金色开放获取路径(52.30%)。大多数欧洲研究资助者和机构都要求研究人员为他们的研究成果提供开放获取,要么在开放获取期刊上发表,要么将已接受的手稿存放在知识库中。研究局限性/意义本研究分析了欧洲OA趋势;其他大陆和国家没有包括在分析中。这项研究只描述了开放办公的政策和任务;没有研究OA政策和任务的执行程度。然而,研究结果可能有助于其他国家的决策者、资助者、研究机构和大学采用和执行开放获取政策和任务。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究是第一个使用多种数据来源调查欧洲国家开放获取出版不同方面的研究,包括开放获取期刊、数字资源库、研究产出、公共资助研究的授权和政策。这些发现将有助于有兴趣促进全球研究人员采用OA的研究人员和政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A partnership between the library and the digital humanities scholars: interview with Plamen Miltenoff Identifying research fronts in NLP applications in library and information science using meta-analysis approaches Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies Cyber security in university libraries and implication for library and information science education in Nigeria The Cologne Public Library as accelerator of digitisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1