Daniel’s Imperial Survey

Katarzyna Lecky
{"title":"Daniel’s Imperial Survey","authors":"Katarzyna Lecky","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198834694.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 2 contrasts Spenser’s affinity for the miniature with Samuel Daniel’s denigration of it. In his laureate poems, Daniel attempted to undermine the cheap county maps that provided an alternative geographic imaginary to James I’s royal unification of England with Scotland. To do so, he borrowed from the language of the survey, a privileged testing-ground for translating the national topography into a broadly comprehensible set of signifiers. Daniel’s chapbooks the Panegyrike Congratulatorie (1603) and the 1607 Funerall Poem both reject the egalitarian principles of practical surveying to instead map for James a magisterial imperial state. This interpretation offers a corrective to existing scholarship on the poet as a populist nationalist by arguing that his works articulated a deeply hierarchical view of the realm. I contrast Daniel’s geographical elitism with John Norden’s accessible pocket-sized guides and surveying manuals circulating in the commonwealth culture of the Inns of Court.","PeriodicalId":118611,"journal":{"name":"Pocket Maps and Public Poetry in the English Renaissance","volume":"169 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pocket Maps and Public Poetry in the English Renaissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198834694.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 2 contrasts Spenser’s affinity for the miniature with Samuel Daniel’s denigration of it. In his laureate poems, Daniel attempted to undermine the cheap county maps that provided an alternative geographic imaginary to James I’s royal unification of England with Scotland. To do so, he borrowed from the language of the survey, a privileged testing-ground for translating the national topography into a broadly comprehensible set of signifiers. Daniel’s chapbooks the Panegyrike Congratulatorie (1603) and the 1607 Funerall Poem both reject the egalitarian principles of practical surveying to instead map for James a magisterial imperial state. This interpretation offers a corrective to existing scholarship on the poet as a populist nationalist by arguing that his works articulated a deeply hierarchical view of the realm. I contrast Daniel’s geographical elitism with John Norden’s accessible pocket-sized guides and surveying manuals circulating in the commonwealth culture of the Inns of Court.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
但以理帝国调查
第二章对比了斯宾塞对微缩画的喜爱和塞缪尔·丹尼尔对微缩画的诋毁。在他的获奖诗歌中,丹尼尔试图破坏廉价的县地图,这些地图为詹姆斯一世皇室统一英格兰和苏格兰提供了另一种地理想象。为了做到这一点,他借用了调查的语言,这是一个将国家地形翻译成广泛可理解的能指集的特权试验场。丹尼尔的书《Panegyrike庆贺》(1603)和《葬礼诗歌》(1607)都拒绝了实际测量的平等主义原则,而是为詹姆斯绘制了一个权威的帝国。这种解释纠正了现有的关于诗人作为民粹民族主义者的学术研究,认为他的作品表达了对这个领域的深刻的等级观念。我将丹尼尔的地理精英主义与约翰·诺顿在联邦法院文化中流传的袖珍指南和测量手册进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Daniel’s Imperial Survey Milton’s Map of Liberty Spenser’s Miniature Map of Faerie Davenant’s Numerical Nationhood Jonson’s Broken Compasses and Bit Parts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1