The Big Screen: Mapping the Diffusion of Foreign Investment Screening Mechanisms

Sarah Bauerle Danzman, Sophie Meunier
{"title":"The Big Screen: Mapping the Diffusion of Foreign Investment Screening Mechanisms","authors":"Sarah Bauerle Danzman, Sophie Meunier","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3913248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the decade following the 2008 financial crisis, many advanced industrialized economies engaged in a competition to attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), whose flows had plummeted following the global shock. At the same time, however, they also implemented or tightened Investment Screening Mechanisms (ISMs), which empower governments to restrict foreign takeovers, especially in strategic sectors. ISMs are an understudied phenomenon in the International Political Economy literature. This research note describes patterns in the evolution of foreign investment screening policies and suggests a research agenda for analyzing these patterns. After defining ISMs and establishing the puzzle of rising investment screening in conjunction with rising efforts to attract FDI, we present a newly coded dataset on ISMs in OECD countries from 2007-2021, examining the evolution of seven key features of investment screening over time. Next, we set an agenda for future research by suggesting three explanations for their recent evolution in the shadow of rising Chinese investment: the role of bottom-up backlashes to economic globalization; elite-driven foreign policy arguments about the increasingly blurred lines between national and economic security in the information economy; and geopolitical transformations that have challenged key features of the post-war liberal order.","PeriodicalId":288317,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Globalization eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Globalization eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3913248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In the decade following the 2008 financial crisis, many advanced industrialized economies engaged in a competition to attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), whose flows had plummeted following the global shock. At the same time, however, they also implemented or tightened Investment Screening Mechanisms (ISMs), which empower governments to restrict foreign takeovers, especially in strategic sectors. ISMs are an understudied phenomenon in the International Political Economy literature. This research note describes patterns in the evolution of foreign investment screening policies and suggests a research agenda for analyzing these patterns. After defining ISMs and establishing the puzzle of rising investment screening in conjunction with rising efforts to attract FDI, we present a newly coded dataset on ISMs in OECD countries from 2007-2021, examining the evolution of seven key features of investment screening over time. Next, we set an agenda for future research by suggesting three explanations for their recent evolution in the shadow of rising Chinese investment: the role of bottom-up backlashes to economic globalization; elite-driven foreign policy arguments about the increasingly blurred lines between national and economic security in the information economy; and geopolitical transformations that have challenged key features of the post-war liberal order.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大银幕:描绘外国投资筛选机制的扩散
在2008年金融危机之后的十年里,许多发达的工业化经济体竞相吸引外国直接投资(FDI),在全球冲击之后,FDI流量大幅下降。然而,与此同时,它们也实施或收紧了投资筛选机制(ISMs),赋予政府限制外资收购的权力,尤其是在战略部门。在国际政治经济学文献中,ISMs是一个未被充分研究的现象。本研究报告描述了外国投资审查政策演变的模式,并提出了分析这些模式的研究议程。在定义了投资审查制度,并确定了投资审查制度与吸引外国直接投资的努力相结合的增加这一难题之后,我们提出了经合组织国家2007-2021年投资审查制度的新编码数据集,研究了投资审查制度的七个关键特征随时间的演变。接下来,我们为未来的研究设定了议程,并对它们在中国投资上升的阴影下最近的演变提出了三种解释:自下而上的经济全球化反弹的作用;关于信息经济中国家安全与经济安全之间界限日益模糊的外交政策争论;地缘政治转型挑战了战后自由秩序的关键特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Difficulties in Finding Middle-Skilled Jobs under Increased Automation Online Shopping with Artificial Intelligence: What Role to play for Trade Marks? The Big Screen: Mapping the Diffusion of Foreign Investment Screening Mechanisms Design Rules Volume 2 Chapter 21—Capturing Value via Strategic Bottlenecks in Digital Exchange Platforms Design Rules Volume 2: Chapter 20—Digital Exchange Platforms: The Technologies of Crowdsourcing and Peer Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1